The petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous and does not survive for further adjudication. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous and closed pending miscellaneous applications without orders on costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3310]
APHC010013532021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1086 OF 2021
Between:
Shakunthala
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.CH SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY)
2.GP FOR SERVICES II (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER :
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. Ch. Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication in the matter and became infructuous.
In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel for the
petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
_______________________________ DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
Dated: 19.12.2024.
KK
Shakunthala
The State Of Andhra Pradesh
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
