This judgment records the High Court's order allowing the withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 16185 of 2012, which challenged the release of a final layout for house site plots in Ongole. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
Permission granted to withdraw; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 16185 OF 2012
Between:
%
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction moreparticularlyone in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents 1 to 4 in not complying with the conditions imposed by 5th respondent for releasing final layout vide L.P No. 22/03/N from the office of 5th respondent, connected to house site plots formed inthelandofAc.17.17 cents in Survey Number 233 of Ongole Municipal Limitsinspiteofrepeated representations submitted by petitioners and remaindersaddressed by respondents 5 and 6, as illegal, irregular, irrational,violativeofprovisionsof Andhra Pradesh Town Planning Act, 1920 and rules framedthereunder; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 and offends articles, 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to4 to comply with conditions imposed by respondents 5 and 6 immediatelyandcausethefinal layout released
LA. NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 20840 OF 2012)
Petition under Section 151-CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppbrt of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to complywith the conditions imposed by 5th respondent for releasing final layoutvideL.P.No.22/03/N from the office of 5th respondent, connected to housesiteplotsformedin the land of Ac. 17.17 cents' in Survey Number 233 of Ongole Municipal Limits
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents Nos.i to 3: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI M SRINIVASA RAO
1
APHC010543092012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI eSS (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 16185/2012
Between;
...PETITIONER(S) 1 .m . Subash Chandra Bose, S/o. Venkateswarlu, and Others
AND
State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Counsel for the Respondent(S);
1.M SRINIVASA RAO
2.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 3.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
4.SHANTHI NEELAM
The Court made the following:
ORDER;
learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr T.Praveen Kumar learned counsel for the petitioners seeks Mr Nimmagadda Satyanarayana permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2
shall be no order as to costs.
shall stands As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending,
closed.
Sd/- l^Rl DEVI ASSISTANJ REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC OFFICER
To,
bhb
HIGH COURT
DATED;24/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.16185 of 2012
f’ 18 MAR 2025 S
®9i
1^ . Current cieciion .
dismissing the wp as withdrawn WITHOUT COSTS
M. Subash Chandra Bose and Others
State of Andhra Pradesh
K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
