Dismissed

Sri Daram Pulla Reddy, Prakasam Dist and 3 Others v. Joint Collector Cum Settlement Officer, Prakasam Dist and 3 O

Andhra Pradesh HC23 Sept 2024WP/23738/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 23738 of 2012 challenging a proposed auction of temple lands. The petitioner failed to appear personally or through counsel on three separate occasions (22.08.2024, 03.09.2024, 24.09.2024), leading the Court to conclude the case was not prosecuted.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution; no further time will be granted.

Sri Daram Pulla Reddy, Prakasam Dist and 3… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: ^3738 OF 2012

¶6

Between;

¶7

Sri Daram Pulla Reddy, S/o Late Sri Daram Vengala Reddy, Aged 58 years, Occ; Agriculure

¶8

Sri Daram China Yallamanda Reddy, S/o Late Sri Daram Vengala Aged 56 years, Occ: Agriculture

¶9

Sri Daram Anki Reddy, S/o Late Sri Daram Vengala Aged 54 years, Occ; Agriculture All R/o Mannepalli village, Talluru mandal, Prakasam District

¶10

...PETITIONERS

¶11

AND

¶12

The Joint Collector-cum-Settlement Officer, Prakasam Dist.

¶13

The Asst.
Commissioner,
Endowments Department, Ongole
Prakasham District.
3. The Tahsildar, Tallur Mandal, Prakasham District
4. Sri Chenna Kesava Swamy Temple, Mannepalli, Talluru Mandal,
Prakasam District, Rep. by its Manager

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proposed auction of the alleged lands of Sri Chenna Kesava Swamy Temple, Respondent No.4 herein above even before appeal time is over against the order^{dt.20-06-2012} in R.Dis. (F2)2982/11(a)/1998 on the file of the 1st respondent as being illegal and arbitrary and set aside the proposed auction.

¶17

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012fWVMP. NO: 4041 OF 2012)

¶18

Between:

¶19

Sri Chenna Kesava Swamy Temple, Mannepalli, Talluru Mandal Prakasam District, Rep. by its Manager. ...Petitioners

¶20

Sri Daram Pulla Reddy, S/o Late Sri Daram Vengala Reddy, Aged 58 years, Occ; Agriculure

¶21

Sri Daram China Yallamanda Reddy, S/o Late Sri Daram Vengala Aged 56 years, Occ: Agriculture

¶22

Sri Daram Anki Reddy, S/o Late Sri Daram Vengala Aged 54 years, Occ: Agriculture All R/o Mannepalli village, Talluru mandal, Prakasam District.

¶23

(All are R/o. Mannepalli Village, Talluru Mandal, Prakasam District)

¶24

...Respondents/Writ Petitioners

¶25

The Joint Collector-cum-Settlement Officer, Prakasam^Dist.

¶26

The Asst. Commissioner, Endowments Department, Ongole Prakasham District.

¶27

¶28

¶29

The Tahsildar, Tallur Mandal, Prakasham District

¶30

...RESPONDENTS

¶31

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order made in WPMP.No.30311 of 2012 dated 01.08.2012 in WP.No.23738 of 2012 and dismiss the writ petition.

¶32

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2012rWPMP. NO: 30311 OF 20121

¶33

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain respondent No.2 and 4 from conducting^{auctionoflease} hold rights of subject matter of lands allegedly belonging^{toChennaKesava} Swamy Temple of Mannepally village, Talluru mandal, Prakasam district, pursuant to the order dt. 20-06-2012 in R.Dis. (F2)2982/11(a)/19 98 passed by the 1st respondent.

¶34

Counsel for the Petitioners: NONE APPEARED

¶35

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: ASST GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

¶36

Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: SRI V T M PRASAD (STANDING COUNSEL)

¶37

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶38

APHC010151992012

¶39

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶40

[3310]

¶41

TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶42

PRESENT

¶43

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶44

WRIT PETITION NO: 23738/2012

¶45

Between:

¶46

Sri Daram Pulla Reddy, Prakasam Dist & 3 Others and Others

¶47

...PETITIONER(S)

¶48

AND

¶49

Joint Collector Cum Settlement Officer Prakasam Dist 3 ...RESPONDENT(S) O and Others

¶50

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶51

1.PASAM SRINIVASA REDDY

¶52

Counsel for the Respondent(S);

¶53

1.VTM PRASAD

¶54

2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

¶55

The Court made the following Order:

¶56

Mr.Abdul Rashid, learned Assistant Government Pleader for

¶57

Endowments is present.

¶58

On verifying the proceeding sheet, it is observed that,^onanearlier occasion i.e., on 22.08.2024, as there was no representation^onbehalfof the petitioners, the matter was directed to be posted to 03.09.2024, finally.

¶59

¶60

Thereafter, when the matter was listed on 03.09.2024, again there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and the^{matterwasdirectedto} be posted to 24.09.2024, as a last chance and on a^condition that “no further time will be granted”.

¶61

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners either personally or through^advocate. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute^thecase.

¶62

Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There

¶63

shall be no order as to costs.

¶64

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand

¶65

closed.

¶66

Sd/- U.SRI DEV! ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S>v SECTION OFFICER

¶67

To.

¶68

One CC to Sri Pasam Srinivasa Reddy Advocate [OPUC]

¶69

Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. One CC to Sri V T M Prasad (Standing Counsel) [OPUC]

¶70

Three CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:24/09/2024

ORDER

WP.No.23738 of 2012

ands^
s>
= 01 MAR 2025
Current Section
£>i?SPATC.^^I«^

¶77

DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON-PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS

Sri Daram Pulla Reddy, Prakasam Dist and 3 Others v. Joint Collector Cum Settlement Officer, Prakasam Dist and 3 O

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Daram Pulla Reddy, Prakasam Dist and 3 Others v. Joint Collector Cum Settlement Officer, Prakasam Dist and 3 O

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Vengaiah, Nellore Dist and Another Vs Prl Secy, Industries and Commerce (M-I) Dept, Hyd and 3 Ot

Somala Kushala Vs the State of Ap

Siddala Ravi Babu, S/o Late Krishnaiah Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Battula Jaya Lakshmi, Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal

1.M. Subash Chandra Bose, S/o. Venkateswarlu, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Gogineni Venkateswarlu Vs State of Andhra PRadesh Rep. by its