Writ petition against the Principal Secretary, Planning and Cooperation Department and others was dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission that the matter had become infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010030282013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3330]
TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 19392/2013
Between:
Dasari Bangaru Naidu, Visakhapatnam District
...PETITIONER
AND
Prl Secretary Planning Coop Deptiv Hyd 4 Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SITA RAM CHAPARLA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2
The Court made the following order :-
The learned counsel for the petitioner without assigning any reasons submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Basing upon the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any,
shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO
Date: 06.08.2024 KBN
3
26
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.19392 of 2013
Date: 06.08.2024
KBN
Dasari Bangaru Naidu
Prl Secretary Planning Coop Dept
4 Others
Tarlada Rajasekhara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
