Disposed
D.Ratna Kumari, v. Dr. Siva Kumar
Andhra Pradesh HCCC/757/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI MONDAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI MONDAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
f
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 757 OF 9n9d
Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent contemnors and punish them for violating the orders passed in W.P.No. 11308/2019, dt- 12.05.2023 in accordance with law.
Between:
D.Ratna Kumari, W/o. T.J. Mohan Rao, Age; 64 yrs, Occ- Retd. Personal Officer in APSRTC, Vijayawada, R/o Plot No.9 STBL Colony, Malikarjuna
School Road, Gannavaram Post, Krishna District.
...Petitioner
AND
(Pensions), Barkathpura, Hyderabad.
%
...Respondents
I i'r .. Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Vasavi Ratna Kumari Dandamudi Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Sri T. Balaji
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Sri M. Solomon Raj u The Court made the following:
APHC010044242024
•I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3330]
MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 757/2024 Between:
D.Ratna Kumari
...PETITIONER
AND
Dr Siva Kumar and another ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.VASAVI RATNA KUMARI DANDAMUDI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.T BALAJI
2.M SOLOMON RAJU
The Court made the following order:
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents have passed the demand letter, dated 06.09.2023 and prayed the Court to close the contemptcase granting liberty to assail the said demand letter.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed granting liberty to the petitioner to assail the demand letter, dated 06.09.2023, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this contempt case, shall stand closed.
Sd/- V. DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTI C^N OFFICER
<**
Stu
Cnr
y
HIGH COURT
DATED: 05/08/2024
ORDER
CC.No.757 of 2024
w-
;7C •
Y
.’X-
1^2- t 1 DtC 20W 3
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
D. Ratna Kumari
S. Siva Kumar
Md. Hafeez
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court