Petitioner sought writ to compel authorities to take action against an accused for non-response to representations. Court permitted withdrawal of the writ petition, dismissing the same without costs.
Permission accorded to withdraw the writ petition. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19201 OF 2015 ,
Between:
A.G. Murali, S/o Vishvanadha Rao Age 39 Years Managing Partner, M/s. Sri Veeranjaneya Mineral Products, D.No. 8-83, Naiduthoda, Vepagunta (post), Visakhapatnam
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2,3,4 in not taking action pursuant to the written representations file by the petitioner, dated 15-03-2015, 04-04-2015 and 21-05-2015 is arbitrary bad
and illegal and contrary to the Criminal Procedure Court concequently direct respondents 1 to 4 to take action against the 5th Respondent as per Law In the interest of justice.
J.A. NO: 1 OF 2015rWPMP. NO: 24819 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2, 3, 4 and to consider the written representation of the petitioner dated 21-05-2015 and take action as per law In the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Prameela, representing
Sri Kuriti Bhaskara Rao
Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Home (AP)
GP for Revenue (AP)
The Court made the following:
(
It
APHC0I0025I620I5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
MONDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19201 OF 2015
Between: A.G. Mural'
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. KURITI BHASKARARAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP)
Counsel for the Respondents: 15548/GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following Order:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.Prameela,learned counsel representing Mr.Kuriti Bhaskara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner is present. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for The official respondents furnished acopyofletteraddressedto the Government Pleader, High Court of Andhra Pradesh,Amaravathibythe Sub-Inspector of Police, Vallampudi Police Station,VizianagaramDistrict, along with a letter given by the petitioner, statingthatthepetitionerintends to withdraw writ petition and requested this Court topermithim to withdrawal his writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, ifany, shall
stand dismissed.
Sd/- K.J.RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SE(^fOfTOFFICER
To,
/
✓
cvss
w
HIGH COURT
DATED:19/02/2024
ORDER
WP.No.19201 of 2015
of
r
m
a 19 DEC im Co
^c. Current Section
PeSPATCV^^
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
A.G. Murali
State of Andhra Pradesh
District Collector, Vizianagaram
Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram
Sub Inspector of Police, Vallampudi
Veerla Balakrishna
DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
