Smt. R.Suneetha v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed a writ petition filed in 2015 concerning inaction by police authorities in registering an FIR. The court held that after a lapse of nine years, without the petitioner appearing or updated status furnished by respondents, it was not possible to pass orders.
What the court decided
f
IN THE HIGH CQURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THF SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 9070 OF 2015
Between:
Srtit. R.Suneetha, W/o. Narsareddy, aged about 34 years, Occ: Flower Vendor, R/o. Vantavari polony, near New Markpt, 2nd Line, Ongolp, Prakasam District.
...PETITIONER
AND
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Home □apartment). Secretariat, Hyderabad.
- The Superintendent of Police, Qngole, Prakasam District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed in 2015 regarding non-registration of FIR can be effectively disposed of after a lapse of 9 years without the petitioner appearing or updated status provided.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. R. Suneetha
- respondent
The State of Andhra Pradesh
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Ongole
- respondent
The Station House Officer, I Town Police Station, Ongole
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/9070/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court