Writ petition seeking a mandamus directing police respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representations was withdrawn by the petitioner with leave of the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
A
TUESDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI -
WRIT PETITION NO: 14557 OF 2024
Between:
Velpula Suresh, S/o Nageswararao, resident of Musalimadugu Village Khammam, Telangana-507165
...Petitioner
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 for not disposing my representations submittedon15.04.2024 and 29.04.2024 till today is illegal, arbitrary againstlawand violation of Articles 21, 300-A of the Constitution of India and also to direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to dispose of the Representationssubmitted on 15.04.2024 and 29.04.2024 by the Petitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. KRISHNA YANNI
Counsel for the Respondents No.s 1 TO 4 : GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondents No. 5 :
The Court made the following: ORDER
0
APHC010253402024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3368]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 14557/2024
Between:
Velpula Suresh ...PETITIONER
AND
The State of AP and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
ORDER
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India is filed for the following relief:
“.....to issue an appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents No. 2 to4 for not disposing my representations submitted on 15.04.2024 and 29.04.2024 till today is illegal, arbitrary against law and violation of Articles 21,
2
300-A of the Constitution of India and also to direct the Respondents No. 2 to 3 to dispose of the Respondents submitted on 15.04.2024 and 29.04.2024 by the Petitioner and to pass.... ”
- Sri Yanni Krishna, learned counsel for the petitionerfiled memo seeking permission to withdraw the Writ Petition.
- Sri S.Sarath Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is present.
- Permission is accorded.
- Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any
pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- B. PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
To,
MSST
HIGH COURT
DATED:10/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.14557 of 2024
50
o\
' 15 MAR 2025 C9cn'-
Current Section ^
{^esPATCVA’E^i^
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN
WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Velpula Suresh
The State of AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department
The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam
The Station House Officer, Tekkali Police Station
The Station House Officer, Kotabommali Police Station
Murapaka Kalidasu
B V L N Chakravarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
