Writ petition seeking an enquiry into a police officer's involvement in civil disputes; counsel submitted the cause no longer survived and the petition had become infructuous.
None granted; petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdictio,ti)
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L M^HAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 42871 OF 20^
Between:
Y. Siva Sankar Reddy, S/o. Tirumala Reddy, aged about 52 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Avilala, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ/Order/Direction more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not conducting an enquiry on the involvement of 5th respondent into civil disputes pursuant to an Endorsement dated 25.07.2018 pursuant to
as illegal, arbitrary, without dated 11.07.2018 of the petitioner complaint of India and of Art. 14 of the Constitution besides violation jurisdiction enquiry into the the 3rd respondent herein conduct an consequently direct civil disputes by constituting a of 5th respondent into involvement 06.11.2010 pursuant to an G.O.Ms.No.288 dated committee as per 25.07.2018 of the 3rd respondent. endorsement dated
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circunnstances the High Court may be stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition constitute a committee as per direct the 4th respondent to pleased to the 5th respondent on his dated 06.11.2010 against G.O.Ms.No.288 endorsement dated 25.07.2018 of the involvement into civil disputes as per int dated 11.07.2018 of the petitioner 3rd respondent pursuant to complaint , forthwith pending disposal of the Writ Petition
;Sri. Srinivasulu Kurra Counsel for the Petitioner ; GP for Home (AP) Counsel for the Respondents The Court made the following; ORDER
/
'4
APHC010886462018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3368]
0-5^? (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 42871/2018
Between:
Y. Siva Sankar Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SRINIVASULU KURRA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief:
“....to issue a Writ/Order/Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not conducting an enquiry on the involvement of respondent into
2 civil disputes pursuant to an Endorsement dated 25.07.2018 pursuant to complaint dated 11.07.2018 of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary without Jurisdiction besides violation of Art 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent herein conduct an enquiry into the involvement of 5^^ respondent into civil disputes by constituting a committee as per G.O.Ms.No.288, dated 06.11.2010 pursuant to an endorsement dated 25.07.2018 of the 3''"' respondent and to pass..."
- Sri Srinivasulu Kurra, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
- Sri S.Sarath Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is present.
- Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs.
- Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs.
■iiririT‘~ffiTTT'-
I
..•••rjiSL-:---;..
3 As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any
pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
\M
To,
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- P.VENKATA RAMANA JOINT,REGISTRAR
SE6TT(5^rOFFICER
^
HIGH COURT
JLSR
BVLNC.J
DATED:09/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.42871 of 2018
o
'he\o 2 ii OCT 202'! m
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Y. Siva Sankar Reddy
State of Andhra Pradesh
Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh
Deputy Inspector General of Police, Rayalaseema Region
Superintendent of Police (Urban), Tirupati UPD
Circle Inspector of Police, M.R.Palli Police Station
B V L N Chakravarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
