Disposed

Segi Reddy Bharathi v. Sri.Sasibhushan Kumar

Andhra Pradesh HC17 Nov 2024CC/727/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt case alleging willful disobedience of the High Court's order dated 09.11.2023 in WP No. 24449 of 2023. Petitioner's counsel submitted respondents had paid the amount and complied with the orders; the court closed the contempt case with liberty for separate proceedings on any further claim, with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed recording compliance; liberty to pursue further claims separately.

Segi Reddy Bharathi Vs Sri.Sasibhushan Kumar — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶2

MONDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶5

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 727 OF 2024

¶6

Contempt case 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to Punish the Respondents herein for willfully violating and disobeying the Orders of High Court dated 09.11.2023 in WP No 24449/2023.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Segi Reddy Bharathi, W/o. B Malleswara Reddy, Aged about. 38 years, R/o. H.No. 1-27, Bandi Atmakur, Bhojanam, Nandyala^{District-518513.}

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

Sri Sasibhushan Kumar, The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Principal Secretary, Irrigation and Water Resources Department,^Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶12

Sri. Shamsher Singh Rawat The State of Andhra Pradesh,^rep.by Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat,^Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶13

. Sri. Manzir Jeelani samoon Nandyal, I.A.S., The District^Collector Nandyala, Nandyala, District.

¶14

P.Reddy Shekar Reddy, The Superintendent of Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Kurnool, Kurnool District.

¶15

1
4
■/>: V 'S. B. Raghu Rami Reddy., The Executive Engineer, Water Resources
4
V'
Department, M.l. Works Division, Nandyala, Nandyala District.
4

¶16

...Respondents

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents No.1,3,4 & 5: SMT. S SIVA KUMARI

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI NAGARAJU PULLAGURA

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

APHC010058752024

¶22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶23

[3329]

¶24

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶25

MONDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶26

PRESENT

¶27

the honourable SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶28

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 727/2024

¶29

Between:

¶30

Segi Reddy Bharathi ...PETITIONER

¶31

AND

¶32

Sri Sasibhushan Kumar and Others

¶33

...CONTEMNOR(S)

¶34

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶35

tannamneedi balakrishna

¶36

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶37

TNAGARAJU pullagura

¶38

2 S SIVA KUMARI

¶39

The Court made the following:

¶40

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶41

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 727/2024

¶42

ORDER

¶43

This contempt case is filed against the respondents^{forwillfuldisobedience} of the orders dated 09.11.2023 passed by this Court^{inW.P.No.24449of2023.}

¶44

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel^{forthepetitioner} submitted that the respondents paid the amount and^{compliedwiththeorders} dated 09.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.24449^{of2023,andhence,no} further orders are required to be passed in the contempt^case.

¶45

Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is^closed, granting liberty to the petitioner for initiating separate proceedings^{forfurtherclaim} if any. No order as to costs.

¶46

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.

¶47

SD/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

To.

SECTION OFFICER

Sri.Sasibhushan Kumar, Principal Secretary, Irrigation^andWater Resources Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi Guntur District.

¶52

Sri. Shamsher Singh Rawat, Principal Secretary, Finance Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶53

^ Sri. Manzir Jeelani Samoon Nandyal, I.A.S., The^{DistrictCollector} Nandyala, Nandyala, District.

¶54

P Reddy Shekar Reddy The Superintendent of Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Kurnool, Kurnool District.

¶55

B.Raghu rami reddy. The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, M.l. Works Division, Nandyala, Nandyala^District.

¶56

One CC to Sri. Annamneedi Balakrishna, Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to Smt. S Siva Kumari, Advocate [OPUC] 8. One CC to Sri Nagaraju Pullagura, Advocate.[OPUC]

¶57

Three CD Copies

vna

<r».

HIGH COURT

DATED: 18/11/2024

ORDER

CC.No.727 of 2024

5 21 m 7m
^ . Current Section .
^^SPATCWS>

¶65

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS

Segi Reddy Bharathi v. Sri.Sasibhushan Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Segi Reddy Bharathi v. Sri.Sasibhushan Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.D., M/S Usha Spincoat India Pvt., Ltd., Krishna Dist Vs Chief M.D., Apspdcl., Tpt., Chittoor Dist & 2 Others

Kaila Poornaiah Vs Idbi Bank, Danavaipeta Branch, Rajahmahendravaram

P.M.R. Junior and Degree College (An Accredited centre), Vs National Institute of Open Schooling

M/s. Sri Sai Agencies Vs Union of India

Sri Seshachala Constructions Vs Sesibhushan Kumar

G.Bhupal Chowdary Vs Sri.Sasi Bhushan Kumar,Ias