The High Court closed Writ Petition No. 14282 of 2017 and related miscellaneous applications on counsel's submission that no further orders were required, imposing no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 14282 OF 2017
Between:
<1?
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction one in the nature of writ of Certiorari quashing the FIR/Crime No. 391 of 2016 on the file of the Arundelpet PS, Guntur Urban District, the 3rd respondent herein, after calling for the records.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 17699 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of FIR/Crime No.391 of 2016 on the file of the Arundelpet P.S., Guntur Urban District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and passsuchotherorder or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and properinthecircumstances of the case otherwise petitioner would be put to irreparable loss and injury.
<1?
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP. NO: 2427 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dt. 20.4.2017, made in WP No. 14282/17.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI. SINGAM SRINIVASA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 to 2: GP FOR HOME (AP)
Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following ORDER:
APHC010030872017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
FRIDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 14282/2017
Between:
Krishna Murthy Ganesh, and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petltioner(S):
...RESPONDENT(S)
1.SINGAM SRINIVASA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME (AP)
2.4468/KSRINIVAS
The Court made the following:
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned
counsel for the petitioners, Sri.Singam Srinivasa Rao, appeared
through virtual hearing and submitted that no furtherordersare
required in the present writ petition.
- Learned Assistant Government Pleader for home representing the official respondents is present.
- Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition isclosed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any.
shall stand closed.
To,
SD/- K. TATA RAO //TRUE COPY// DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECThDN OFFICER
PRK
( ••
*
HIGH COURT
DATED:03/05/2024
ORDER
WP.No.14282 of 2017
X 0 6 SEP 2m s
^ Current Section
se*
CLOSING THE WP, WITHOUT COSTS
Krishna Murthy Ganesh
C. Balaiah Chowdary
T.K. Pattanaik
S. Venkateswarlu
Y. Nageswaram
B.R. Kishore Singh
K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
