A writ petition by kerosene dealers seeking permission to use 15-year-old tank trucks for lifting PDS kerosene quotas was dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated no cause survived; interim orders vacated and no costs ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 14144 OF 2014
Between:
AND
Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Chief Terminal Manager, Marketing Division, Chittoor Terminal, Yadamari Village & Mandel, Chittoor District - 517 422.
...Respondent
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent and its sub-ordinates in not permitting the Petitioners to engage 15 years old Tank Trucks for lifting the PDS kerosene quota allotted to them every month for distribution to the retailers as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the Respondent and its sub-ordinates to deliver the kerosene quota to the Tank Trucks engaged by the Petitioners without reference to the year of making of the Tank Trucks.
Si,
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 17614 OF 20141
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe the Respondent and its sub-ordinates not to insistupon pleased to direct Tank Trucks, having been manufactured the Petitioner to engage the PDS kerosene quota for distribution to the below 15 years for lifting retailers, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents; SRI VENKATA DURGA RAOANANTHA The Court made the following order:
:r APHC010687022014
■ K.1;
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3233]
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
\
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PFTITION NO: 14144/2014
Between:
Mng Partner, M/s.sri Balaji Oil Agencies, ChittoorDist&2 and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
Chief Terminal Mgr loci Chittoor District
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.N SIVA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent:
1 .VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA
2.SA1 SANJAY SURANENI
The Court made the following Order:
Sri N. Siva Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, no cause survives in this Writ Petition.
- Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
2
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any,shallstand closed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
- One CC to Sri N Siva Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
- One CC to Sri Venkata Durga Rao Anantha, Advocate [OPUC]
- Two CD Copies
RAM
HIGH COURT
DATED:28/03/2024
ORDER
WP.No.14144 of 2014
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Sri Balaji Oil Agencies
M/s Bhaskar & Co.
M/s Shaba Agencies
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
B Krishna Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
