Disposed

G Siva Mallikarjuna v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC4 Jul 2024WP/14042/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Shop licence holders near Srisailam Devasthanam sought extension of licence hold rights on par with others. The court, without going into merits, directed respondents 2 and 3 to consider their representation dated 02.04.2024 with reference to the proceedings dated 06.03.2024 within four weeks and communicate the decision.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents 2 and 3 to consider representation dated 02.04.2024 referring to D.Dis.No.D2/COE-14025(51)/13/2024 dated 06.03.2024, within four weeks; no costs.

G Siva Mallikarjuna Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

'(!'

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANQHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR /r

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 14042 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

G. Siva Mallikarjuna, S/o G. Semilayya.
Age: 51 Years, Occ: Business,
R/o D.No. 4-8-374, Kothapet, Sri Giricolony,
Srisailam, Kurnool District

¶9

Sane Krishnudu, S/o Subbaih,
Age: 47 Years, Occ: Business,
R/o D.No. 4-7-249, Kothapeta,
Srisailam, Kurnool District

¶10

Ande Kottayya, S/o Kotayya
Age: 44 Years, Occ: Business,
R/o D.No. 4-7-74, Kothapeta, Goshala Backside
Srisailam, Kurnool District

¶11

Kakumanu Nagarajachari, S/o Pedda Narsaiah,
Age: 51 Years, Occ: Business,
R/o D.No. 1-2-178, PG Road,
Srisailam, Kurnool District
5- Chaduvula Srinivasulu, S/p Venkatamana,
Age: 32 Years, Occ: Business,
R/o D.No. 3-6-107, Kothapeta,
Srisailam, Kurnool District

¶12

Seelam Kavitha C/o C Srinivasulu,
Age: 33 Years, Occ: Business,
R/o D.No. 3-6-107, Kothapeta,
Srisailam, Kurnool District

¶13

7.	Le Kajjayam Jaya Chandra Gupta S/o Muni Rama Koteswara Rpo Age. 27 Years, Occ: Business R/o D.No. 4-8-67 . . , Kothapet, onsailam, Kurnool District
8.	Paluru Kiran Kumar. S/o Chinna Age; 45 Years, Occ: Business D.Na 6/78, Kanigapeta, Kanala, Kurnool Drstrict, Andhra Pradesh Subramanyam
	^^"’maraKrishnachary, S/o PeddaAchari Age;47 years, Occ; Business R/o D No. 1-2-105/1, Workshop, Snsailam, Kurnool District
10.	Vemula Sridhar S/o V.Narayana Age.^44 Yeas, Occ; Business, R/oDNo. ^2-63, Pafhalaganga Road, Snsailam, Kurnool District
11.	Siddeam Sudhakar, S/o Narayana Age; 51 Years, Occ; Business R/o D No. 4-8-392, Srisailam, brisailam, Kurnool District
12.	Aravapalli Manikanta, S/o Satyan 28Years, Occ; Business, I ^-®-420/1(A), SrigiriColony Snsailam, Kurnool District rayana
13.	'^"iaheyulu, R? Business, R/oD No, 4-7-253, Kothapeta, Srisa/lam, Kurnool District
14.	Age.53Years,Occ;Business, U. Raju,

¶14

t -

¶15

§ /■

¶16

R/q D.No. 1-2-158, P.G Road, Srisailam, Kurnool District

¶17

Devaki Venkata Narayana S/o Subbarayudu Age: 57 Year$, Occ: Business, R/o D.No. 5-25-97, Eastern Colony, Near Anjaneya Swamy Temple,Sri§aiIam, KurnopI District

¶18

Kaluchuri Venkata Ramanaidu S/o Venkata Naidu Age: 27 Years, Qcc: Business, R/o D.No. 6-130-104, Hospital line, Sundipenta, Bus Stand Back Side, Srisailam, Kurnool District

¶19

Anandam Girija Shankar Swamy, S/o Veerabhadraiah Swamy,Age: 41 Years, Qpc: Business, R/o D.No. 4-8-359/2, Near Wsidom School, Srisailam, Kurnool District

¶20

G. Bhramaramba W/o Pedda Swamy (Late), Age: 37 Years, Occ: Business, R/o D.Np. 3-6-107, LIQ R/9, Near Gpsala Guest House Srisailam, Kurnool District

¶21

Nagamallikarjuna Mari C/o Guru Swami, Age: 51 Years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No. 4-7-29, Kothapeta, Qosala Back side, Srisailam, Kurnool District

¶22

Sirigiri Venkata Seshaiah, S/c Venkateswarlu, Age; 35 Years, Ocp: Business, R/o D.No. 4-7-65/1, Kothapeta, Srisailam, Kurnool District

¶23

Sirigiri Padmavathi, W/o Venkata Seshaiah, Age; 33 Years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No. 5-35, Ramalayam Bazaar, Pullapheruvu Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh

¶24

¶25

Vanja Mallikarjuna S/d Rosaiah, - Age: 42 Years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No. 2-3-33/3, karivenaSatram Srisailam, KurnodI District 23. Venna Sreenivasa Reddy, C/d Venkata Reddy, Age: 52 Years, Occ: Business, R/d D.Nd. 1^-2-149, Pathalaganga Rdad, Srisailam, KurnddI District 24. Aitharaju Swamy S/d Ramulu, Age: 48 Years, Occ: Business, R/d D.Nd. 4-8-360/1, Srisailam, KurnddI District 25. Theta Mallikarjuna S/d Kdtaiah, Age: 37 Years, Occ: Business, R/d D.Nd. 4-7-99, Kdthapeta High SchddI Srisailam, KurnddI District 26. Sadula Madhava Reddy, S/c Venkata Reddy Age: 50 Years, Occ: Business, R/d D.Nd. 4-8-259, Kdthapeta, Srigiri Cdleny, Srisailam, KurnddI District 27. Avula Bramaramba, W/c Kctayya, Age: 41 Years, Occ: Business, R/d D.Nd. 4-7-249, Kdthapeta, Gdshala Back Side Srisailam, KurnccI District 28. Bingi Malyadri, C/d Malakdndaiah, Age: 60 Years, Occ: Business, R/d D.Nd. 4-8-421, Kdthapeta, Srigir Cdleny Srisailam, Kurneel District 29. Pdttipati Anil Kumar Reddy, S/c Chinna Ankireddy, Age: 35 Years, Occ: Business,

¶26

¶27

¶28

	R/o D.No. 4-8-241, Kothap^ta, Srigiri Cpiony, Srisailam, Kurnool District
30.	Linga Narendra, S/o Venkateswarip, Agp; 53 Yeprs, Occ: Business, R/0 D.No. 2-3-6/1, Ppthalaganga Road, Srisailam, Kurnool District
31.	Linga Jagadeesh, S/o Narendra Age; 33 Years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No. 2-3-6/1, Pathala Ganga Road, Srisailam, Kurnool District
32.	Kajjyam Srinivasa Rao, S/o Venkata Lingaiah Age: 50 Years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No. 4-8-356, Srisailam, Kurnool District
33.	Akula Venkata Shiva, Age: 23 Years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No. 3-15-97, Suleman Centre, Sunnipenta, Srisailam, Kurnool District
34.	EdigeKollamaiah Goud, S/o Nagalaxmaiah Goud, Age: 48 Years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No. 1-1-175, Yengulacheruvu Katta, Srisailam, Kurnool District
35.	Bandige Chaitanya Kumar S/o Subbarayudu Agp: 21 Years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No. 4-7-69, Kothapeta, Srisailam, Kurnool District ...Petitioners AND
1.	The State ofAndhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue(Endowments)Department,

¶29

^ —

¶30

¶31

Secretariat. Velgapudi, Amaravathi Guntur District.

¶32

¶33

The Commissioner, Endowments Department. GolJapudi.. Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶34

Sri BrahamramabaMallikarjuna Swamy Vari Devasthanam Srisailam, Kurnool District Rep. by its Executive officer

¶35

...Respondents

¶36

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in not considering the case of the petitioners for extending^the license hold rights of petitioner shops bearing numbers G-1, D-10, D-5, F-8, K-7, J-6, A- 17. F- 1, F-5, E-17, D-9. D-8. A-2, E-9, D-17, C-2, C-7. K-8. K-2. D-6 D-15. C-5, D-7, D-12, P-13, F-7, C-6, E-7, G-2. C-1. D-1, D-3 G-6, C-5. A/BI situated in Lalitambika Complex near the 3*^Vespondent temple as was donp m case of others as per the proceedings of the 2”respondent In D.Dis No. D2/COE- 14025(51 )/13/2024 dated 06.03.2024 for a period 6f 11 years as per Rule 12(2) of the ARC and HRI and Endowments Immovable Properties and Other Rights (Other Than Agricultural Lands) Leases and License Rules, 2003 as bad, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, abuse of power and violative of Articles 14. 19 (1)(g) end 21 of Constitution of Indiaand of consequently direct the respondents to extend the license hold rights above said petitioner shops for a further period of 11 (Eleven) years.

¶37

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶38

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated i *n the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tP direct the respondents no. 2 and 3 to consider the petitioners’ representation dated 02.04.2024 by referring to the proceedings of 2nd respondent in D.Dis No. D2/COE-14025(51)/1 3/2024 dated 06.03.2024.

¶39

Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. D V SASIDHAR

¶40

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 &2: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

¶41

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI G RAMANA RAO

¶42

% APHC010228342024

¶43

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

¶44

ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶45

[3310]

¶46

FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT

¶47

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 14042/2024

¶48

Between:

¶49

G.Siva Mallikarjuna and others ...PETITIONER(S)

¶50

AND

¶51

The State of AP and others ...RESPONDENT(S)

¶52

Counsel for the Petitioner{S):

¶53

1.D.V.SAS1DHAR

¶54

Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

¶55

The Court made the following order:

¶56

The present writ petition is filed under Article 226^ofthe

¶57

Constitution of India seeking the following relief;

¶58

“...tQ issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus^declaring the action of respondents in not considering the case^Qfthe petitioners for extending the license hold rights of^petitioner shope bearing numbers G-1, D-10, D-5, F-8, K-7, J-6,^A-17,F- 1, F-5, E-17, D-9, D-8. A-2, E-9, D-17, C-2, C-7, K-8,^K-2,D-6 D-15, C-5. D-7, D-12, P-13, F-7, C-6, P-7, G-2, C-1,^0-1,P-3 G-6, C-5, A/BI situated in Lalitambika Complex near^the3 respondent temple as was done in case of others as^perthe proceedings of the 2"^ respondent in P.Pis No.P2/COE14025(51)713/2024, dated 06.03.2024 for a period of^11years as per Rule 12(2) of the ARC and HR! and Endowments Immovable Properties and Other Rights (Other Than Agricultural Lands) Leases and License Rules, 2003,^asbad, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, abuse of power^{andviplativeof} Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to extend the license hold rights of above said petitioner shops for a further^period of 11 (Eleven) years...”

¶59

¶60

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that it would suffice to dispose of this writ petition directing the

¶61

¶62

respondents to dispose of the representation dated^02.04.2024 by referring to the proceedings in D.Dis.No.D2/GOE14025(51 )/13/2024, dated 06.03.2024.

¶63

In reply, learned Government Pleader for Endowments appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and Sri G.Ramana^Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 3^^ respondentDevasthanam, reported no objection.

¶64

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel^on both sides, without going into merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the petitioners’ representation, dated 02.04.2024 and pass appropriate^ordersby referring the prbceedihgs in D.Dis.No.D2/COE-14025(51)/ 13/2024, dated 06.03.2024 and in accordance with law,^withina period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt^{ofacopyofthis} order and communicate the same to the petitioners.

¶65

With the above said directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶66

As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending, if^any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

¶67

SD/- K. KASI RAO ACHARI v ASSISTANT registrar |

//TRUE COPY//

To,

/^.SEtTION OFFICER

The Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments) Department, Secretariat,Velgapudi,AmaravathiGuntur District.

¶72

¶73

The Commissioner, Endowments Department Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶74

Sri BrahamramabaMallikarjuna Swamy Vari Devasthanam,^Srisailam, Kurnool District Rep. by its Executive officer

¶75

One CC to SRI. D V SASIDHAR Advocate [OPUC]

¶76

Twq CCs to GP FOR ENDOWMENTS ,High Court Of Andhra^Pradesh. [OUT]

¶77

One CC to Sri G Ramana Rao, SC For Endowments [OPUC]

¶78

Three CD Copies

/ .i

HIGH COURT

\ ••

13ATED:05/07/2024

ORDER

WP.No.14042of2024

DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS

G Siva Mallikarjuna v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G Siva Mallikarjuna v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E. S. Sai Prasad, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

S. Mahaboob Basha, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

V. Emmanuel Raju, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

M Anil Kumar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Munj i Gayathri Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Grandhi Veera Kesava Murthy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh