Dismissed
K. Chakra Suhasini D/o. Chalapathi v. The State of Andhra Pradedsh, Rep
Andhra Pradesh HCWP/13423/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13423 OF 2015
Between:
K. Chakra Suhasini D/o. Chalapathi, Occ; unemployed R/o. H.N0.201030, Co-operative Colony, kadapa Town & District.
...Petitioner
AND
- ■A.Jaya Kumar S/o. Munikrishnaiah, Occ: working assaftware Engineer R/o. K.R.Puram, Banglore. Karanataka State.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in ■'tFie circumstances stated ini the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the respondent.No. 2 to 4 in not providing protection to the petitioner from the hands of the respondent.no.6 to 10, as illegal, arbitrary, against, violate of article 14 ,19 and 21 of Constitution of India, and against the principals of natural justice consequently to direct the respondent.No. 2 to 5 to provide protection to the petitioner by considering her Representation Dt. 13-042015 which sumitted to the 2nd respondent by taking necessary action against the respondent.No.6 to 10 as per law.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 17633 OF
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respandent No. 2 to 5 to provide protection to the petitioner by considering her Representation Dt. 13-04-2015 which sumitted to the 2nd respondent by taking necessary action against the respondent.No.6 to 10 as per law.
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondents Nos. 5 to 10: -
The Court made the following order :
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
W.P.No. 13423 of 2015
ORDER:-
Mr.M.S.P.Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr.Challa Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive, and it has become infructuous.
appearing for the official respondents is present.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as Infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if
an.y, shall stand closed.
Sd/- A.VIJAYA BABU assistant registrar
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BL
HIGH COURT
i
DATED: 12/02/2024
1
1.
ORDER WP.No.13423 of 2015
C9
1
^*^0 »jS
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
K. Chakra Suhasini
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Superintendent of Police, Y.S.R. Kadapa District
The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kadapa Urban
The Station House Officer I
Sri Ramesh
K. Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court