Petitioners sought a mandamus declaring police inaction on their written complaint against respondents 4 and 5 as arbitrary. Police instructions stated no such complaint was received. The court found nothing survived and closed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE NINTHI DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 6703 OF 2015
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
■it
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus,todeclaretheinaction of the respondent No. 3 herein in taking action against the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 herein inspite of the written complaint dt. 10-2-2015 as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 2nd respondent herein to take action against the 3rd respondent hereinforderelictionofhis duties.
i.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 8934 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the Respondent No.3hereintoforthwith register a criminal case against the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 herein pursuant to the complaint dt.10-2-2015, pending disposalofthemainwrit petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. S V INDIRA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME (AP)
Counsel for the Respondent No. 4 to 5:
The Court made the following:
•it
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
Writ Petition No.6703 of 2015
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
“....to declare the inaction of the respondent No.3 herein in taking action against the Respondent Nos.4and 5 herein inspite of the written complaint dt.10.2.2015as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 2"'^ respondent herein to take action againstthe 3^^ respondent herein for dereliction of his duties,andto pass such other order or orders ”
;
- None appeared for the petitioners. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the official respondents, is present.
I
2
show that no complaint was received by the police fromthe
petitioner much less on 10.02.2015.
- So, in view of the above instructions, nothing survives in this writ petition for further adjudication.
- Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending,
shall stands closed.
SD/- V. DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTldN%FFICER
To,
MBT
■is
HIGH COURT
DATED:09/02/2024
ORDER
WP.No.6703 of 2015
e'
\V- ..
V ?n^
''•X ■/
S
CLOSING THE W.P
WITHOUT COST
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police inaction on the petitioners' alleged complaint dated 10.02.2015 was illegal and arbitrary.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K.Vijaya
B.Siva Parvathi
B.Polaru
G.Chinna Susheela
B.Sujana
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
