The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amravati dismissed Writ Petition No. 13333 of 2014 as infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's submission that the cause no longer survives. No costs were awarded.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 13333 OF 2014
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ petition, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the implication of tbe Petitioners No.1 and 2 in Crime No.18 of 2014 of P.S. Ill Town, Visakhapatnam by the Respondents No.2 to 4 as illegal and arbitrary.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 16682 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 not to arrest the Petitioners No.1
i
and 2 in Crime No. 18 of 2014 of P.S. Ill Town, Visakhapatnam without following the due process of law, pending final disposal of the writ petition.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 13333 of 2014
ORDER:
Both the learned counsel are present.
- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. 3. Recording the above submission, the Writ petition ISi dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory appiications, if any pending,
shall stands closed.
SD/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC FFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Advocate fOPUCl 2.3. TwoCCsI hree C.D.Copiesto GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] nm
High COURT
DATED:09/01/2024
ORDER
WP.No.13333 of 2014
App'
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition under Article 226 praying for declaration of implication in criminal case as illegal and arbitrary survives when counsel submits it has become infructuous.
Rayala Raja Rao
Rayala Lakshminarayana
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam
Assistant Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam
Station House Officer, III Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam
K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
