High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner did not appear when notices were issued. No substantive order as to costs or merits was passed.
Writ Petition dismissed. Interlocutory applications stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APHC010072922012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
THURSDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 11867/2012
Between:
Kunapareddy Nan Rao @ Narayana Rao
...PETITIONER
AND
The Registrar and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.A SAMIR KUMAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.V T M PRASAD
2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following:
ORDER :
Mrs.Pulipati Radhika, learned Standing Counsel for Endowments,
appearing for the 2nd respondent, submits that O.A.Nos.52 and 54 of 2008 are pending before the 1st respondent for consideration, however the petitioner is continuing as tenant by paying the rents.
2
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.
_________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
Date: 14.11.2024
ARR
3
HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
Writ Petition No.11867 of 2012
Date: 14.11.2024
ARR
Kunapareddy Nan Rao @ Narayana Rao
The Registrar
K. M. MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
