Dismissed

K.Santhi Kumari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC8 Jul 2024WP/11843/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, addressed a writ petition filed by K.Santhi Kumari seeking a mandate to reconstitute a Hospital Development Society committee in compliance with G.O.Ms.No.48. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the cause no longer survives and dismissed the petition as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition (No. 11843 of 2018) was dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

K.Santhi Kumari Vs The State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 11843 OF 2018

¶6

Between:

¶7

K.Santhi Kumari, aged about 50 years, W/o.K.J .K umar, Chairperson of Nagari Municipality, R/o.S.V.Nagar, Nagari, Chittoor^District

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary Medical and Family Welfare Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi Guntur District.

¶11

The District Collector, Chittoor District.

¶12

The District Coordinator, Hospital Services, Chittoor, Chittoor District

¶13

The Superintendent, Area Hospital, Nagari, Chittoor^District.

¶14

Hospital Development Society, Area Hospital, Nagari, Represented by its Chairperson, T.Michael Raj, aged about, 34 years, S/o.Tasan, R/o.D.No.10/1, Indira Nagar, Kothapet, Nagari Post,^{ChittoorDistrict.}

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to reconstitute the committee of the Hospital Development Society. Area Hospital, Nagari, in strict

¶17

compliance of the guidelines with regard to requisite qualification enumerated in G.O.Ms.No.48, Health, Medical and Family Welfare (D1) Department dated 13-5-2015 by declaring the action of the respondents in constitution of the present committee of the Hospital Development Society in contravention of the guidelines of the said G.O. is illegal and arbitrary. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation dated 10-3-2018 made by the petitioner for reconstitution of the committee of the Hospital Development Society. Area Hospital, Nagari pending Writ Petition.

¶18

lA NO: 2 OF 2018

¶19

Between;

¶20

Hospital Development Society, Area Hospital, Nagari, Represented by its Chairperson, T.Michael Raj, aged about, 34 years, S/o.Tasan, R/o.D.No.10/1, Indira Nagar, Kothapet, Nagari Post, Chittoor District.

¶21

...PETITIONER/R-5

¶22

AND

¶23

K.Santhi Kumari, aged about 50 years, W/o.K.J .K umar. Chairperson of Nagari Municipality, R/o.S.V.Nagar, Nagari, Chittoor^District.

¶24

The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Medical and Family Welfare Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶25

The District Collector, Chittoor District.

¶26

The District Coordinator, Hospital Services, Chittoor, Chittoor District

¶27

The Superintendent, Area Hospital, Nagari, Chittoor^District.

¶28

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶29

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order in lA No. 1/2018 in WP No.11843/2018 dt. 12.04.2018 and to dismiss the writ petition.

¶30

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G RAMACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1,3 & 4: GP FOR MEDICAL^HEALTHFW Counsel for the Respondents No.2: GP FOR REVENUE

¶31

Counsel for the Respondents No.5: SRI V. RAMESH

¶32

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶33

APHC010241262018

¶34

¶35

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

¶36

AT AMARAVATI

¶37

[3310]

¶38

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶39

TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶40

PRESENT

¶41

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶42

WRIT PETITION NO: 11843/2018

Between:

K.santhi Kumari

...PETITIONER

AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

¶48

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶49

1.G RAMACHANDRA REDDY

¶50

Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

¶51

2.RAMESH VODNALA

¶52

3.GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW(AP) The Court made the following:

¶53

ORDER:

¶54

Mr V.Srinivasula Reddy, learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr G.Ramachandra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.

¶55

Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

¶56

shall stands As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending,

closed.

/ 'j

//TRUE COPY//

SD/-G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to SRI G RAMACHANDRA REDDY Advocate [OPUC]

¶65

Two CCs to GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW, High Court Of^Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶66

Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. One CC to SRI V RAMESH Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD copies.

KKK

HIGH COURT

DATED:09/07/2024

ORDER

WP.No.11843 of 2018

DISMISSING T HE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUTS

K.Santhi Kumari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Santhi Kumari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Praja Chaitanya Seva Sangam, (Pcmpc), Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Garlapati Sriram S/o. Purushotham Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary

G. Rama Kriishna Reddy, Vs The Govt. of Ap, Rep. by its

B.V. Subba Reddy Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Mines and Geology

Lalam Nukaratnam Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Sujatha Canteen Service Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, Health Medical and Family