Writ petition challenging continuation of proceedings before the Andhra Pradesh Women's Commission was dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted the cause no longer survived; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY ' V. TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 16106 OF 2017
Between:
...PETITIONER’S
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may
be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the continuation of the nd proceedings against the petitioners before the 2 respondent vide proceedings No.121/2016 as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and contrary to Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently nd set aside the proceedings No.121/2016 before the 2 respondent I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 19802 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in proceedings No. 121/ 2016 before the 2 respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the PetItloner’srSRI. C SHARAN REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 1 & 2: GP FOR WOMEN DEV-CHILD
WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO The Court made the following ORDER:
APHC010138152017
b;
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
MONDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
I
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 16106/2017
Between:
Garlapati Sriram S/o. Purushotham Rao and Others ...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal ...RESPONDENT(S) Secretary and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.C SHARAN REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR WOMEN DEV-CHILD WELFARE(AP)
2.GP FOR HOME (AP)
3.MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO
The Court made the following Order:
Mr.T.Karthik, learned counsel representing Mr.C.SharanReddy,learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the causeinthepresentwritpetition
does not survive, and it has become infructuous.
dismissed as 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is Infructuous,
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
Sd/- U. SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
PRK
HIGH COURT
DATED:08/07/2024
ORDER
WP.No.16106 of 2017
andh^;^
m t
X 0 8 JAN 2025
CO//
O ^
^ . Current Section
DISMISSING OF THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Garlapati Sriram
Garlapati Radha Rani
Garlapati Purushotham Rao
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department for Women, Children, Disabled & Senior Citizens
The Andhra Pradesh Women's Commission, Guntur, rep by its Secretary
Garlapati Parvathi Naga Ganga Devi
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
