The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 10483 of 2015 challenging the sale of petitioner properties by a Co-operative Society as infructuous due to the afflux of time. No order as to costs was passed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVi^Sgl
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
»— ' m
-
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR ^
PRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 10483 OF 2015
Between:
...Petitioners
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in |4he circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to, issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ Mandamus declaringtheactionofthe 3rd respondent in passing of Awards/Decrees in case No. 1362/20102011, 1363/2010-2011, 1322/2010-2011, dated 28.2.2011 and thereby notifying sale of Petitioners properties of Ac. 4.74and2nd Petitioner's landed property an extent of Ac. 2.00 cents in R.S.Nos. 328/1, 330/1, 330/2, 330/3, 329/C of Kalavalapalli village is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of the provisionsofAndhraPradeshCo operative Societies Act, 1964 and the Rules framed there under offends Articles 14, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to prevent from proceeding with the sale of petitioner’s properties without following due process of law in passing of the Awards/Decrees.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015rWPMP. NO: 13859 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to order stay of all further proceedings pursuant to Awards / Decrees in case No. 1362/20102011, 1363/2010-2011, 1322/20102011, dated 28.2.2011, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. N ANULA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR COOPERATION
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: M/s BOBBA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
The Court made the following order:
A
APHC010083542015
rj
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3330] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 10483/201
Between:
Prathipati Vishnu Murthy and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.N ANULA
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR COOPERATION (AP)
The Court made the following order:
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO. 10483 of 2015
ORDER:
Ms.P.Lakshmi, learned counsel representing Ms.Anula,learned counsel for the petitioners on record, would submit that the writ petition has rendered infructuous by afflux of time and hence, prayed to dismiss the writ petition and also endorsed the same on the bundle.
In view of the said representation made by the learnedcounsel the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shallstand
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- K.KASI RAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To,
GSC
HIGH COURT DATED:07/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.10483 of 2015
^ 3 S APR 2025 m
. CufrentSartton
DISMISSING OF THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS
Prathipati Vishnu Murthy
Prathipati Kamala
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The District Registrar/Officer on Special duty, The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd.
The Co-operative Assistant Registrar-cum Sale Officer
The Kalavalapalli Primary Co-operative Society, Ltd.
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
