The High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati dismissed a Second Appeal that was not pressed by the counsel as the parties had compromised the matter. No order as to costs.
The Second Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3369]
APHC010343392002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 444/2002
Between:
Sri Sadanala Badrayya And Another
...APPELLANT
AND
Sadanala Subbarao
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.Y V RAVI PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent:
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT:
The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellants against the Judgment and Decree dated 05.10.2001, passed in A.S.No.19 of 1997, on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, West Godavari District, Eluru.
application seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal as parties compromised the matter. In support of his submission, learned counsel for the
appellants furnished a copy of withdrawal letter across the bench and it contains the signatures of both the parties. It seems that the settlement deed is not found in the record.
closed.
________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J
Date: 17.12.2024 M K K
Sri Sadanala Badrayya And Another
Sadanala Subbarao
T Mallikarjuna Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
