Single judge dismissed three second appeals as abated for want of proper representation after legal representatives failed to come on record.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3369]
APHC010856342002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL Nos: 278, 316 and 404/2002
Between:
Guntupalli Mallikarjuna Rao
...APPELLANT
AND
Padmanabha K Gowda
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.M V S SURESH KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.G V S MEHAR KUMAR
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING COMMON JUDGMENT:
The Second Appeal No.278 of 2002 is preferred by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.10.2001, passed in A.S.No.79 of 1995, on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet, Guntur District.
The Second Appeal No.316 of 2002 is preferred by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.10.2001, passed in A.S.No.77 of
1995, on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet,
Guntur District.
The Second Appeal No.404 of 2002 is preferred by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.10.2001, passed in A.S.No.78 of 1995, on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet, Guntur District.
Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand
closed.
________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J
Date: 17.12.2024 M K K
Guntupalli Mallikarjuna Rao
Padmanabha K Gowda
T Mallikarjuna Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
