Second appeal dismissed for default as appellants could not be served notice and showed no interest in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3369]
APHC010066282008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 144/2008
Between:
Guduri Aharone and Others
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
Singamaneni Vijaya Nirmala
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1.T SREEDHAR
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.P RAJASEKHAR
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
have got no instructions from the appellants, this Court ordered notice to the appellants on 19.11.2024 and the notice that was sent to the appellants returned un-served with an endorsement that no such addressee in this door number. Notices were sent to the addresses shown in the memorandum of appeal.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed.
____________________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Date: 17.12.2024 MH
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO
50
S.A.NO: 144 of 2008
Date: 17.12.2024 MH
Guduri Aharone and Others
Singamaneni Vijaya Nirmala
T Mallikarjuna Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
