Second appeal under Section 100 CPC against confirmation of a decree in OS No.207 of 1993 was called for hearing; the appellant did not appear despite being listed for dismissal. The High Court dismissed the second appeal for default with no order as to costs and closed pending miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 1398 OF 2004
Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C, against the Judgment and Decree dated 16-07-2004 passed in A.S No.7 of 2000 on the file of the V Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), East Godavari, Rajahmundry, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 15-09-1999 passed in OS No.207 of 1993 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry.
Betvireen:
Chava Ayyanna Raju, S/o.Chella Rao, aged about 34 years.Cultivation Pallakadiyam, H/o.Kannavaram.
...Appellant/Appellant/Defendant No.2 AND
...Respondent/Respondent/Defendant No.1
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2004 (SAMP. NO: 12902 OF 2004)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the execution proceedings pursuant to the Judgement and decree dated 15/09/1999 in OS.No.207/1993 on the file of I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry confirmed by V Addl. District Judge, Rajahmundry in AS.7/2000 dated 16/07/2004.
Counsel for the Appellant :SRI GULLAPALLI RADHAKRISHNAN
(No representation)
Counsel for the Respondents: --
The Court made the following:
[3369]
APHC010038182004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 1398/2004
Between:
Chava Ayyanna Raju ...APPELLANT
AND
Kurukuri Veera Raju and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.GULLAPALLI RADHAKRISHNAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following Judgment:-
- This Second Appeal has been filed by the Appellant/Appellant/defendent under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the Decree and Judgment dated July 16, 2004 in A.S.No.7 of 1999 on the file of the V Additional District Judge, Rajahmundry, confirming the decree and Judgment dated September 19,1999, in O.S.No.207 of 1993 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry.
learned counsel for the Respondents. In light of hisabsence,thematterwas subsequently passed over until 2:15 PM.
SD/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
BSV
sree
HIGH COURT
DATED: 14/10/2024
■/
JUDGMENT
SA.No.1398 of 2004
1 1 NOV 2(l2‘i ITf
09
. Current Section . ^
DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
"S
s
/(
Chava Ayyanna Raju
Kurukuri Veera Raju
Chava Chella Rao
T Mallikarjuna Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
