Dismissed
M/S B.v.Radha Ramana Gupta and Company v. Allagadda Kiran Kumar
Andhra Pradesh HCSA/241/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
V
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL No.241 of 2006
Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C, against the Judgment and Decree dated 29.08.2005 in A.S.No.58 of 2002 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Narsapur, reversing the Judgment and Decreedated29.08.2002 in O.S.No.183 of 1994 passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Palakol, West Godavari District.
Between:
M/s B.V.Radha Ramana Gupta and Company, Regd. Firm, Palakol Rep. by its Managing Partner, B.V.Radha Ramana Gupta, Palakol PDMC.
...APPELLANT/1®^ RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
AND
...RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT/1®^ DEFENDANT
(Appeal against R-2 is dismissed for default vide C.O.dated 27.01.2015)
...RESPONDENTS/2'^° RESPONDENT/2^° DEFENDANT
Counsel for the Appellant : SRI K SITA RAM
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
The Court made the following JUDGMENT :
'
APHC010025562006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3369]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY .THE FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 241/2006
Between:
M/s B.v.radha Ramana Gupta And Company
...APPELLANT
AND
Allagadda Kiran Kumar and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.KSITA RAM
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
The Court made the following Judgment:
The Second appeal is filed aggrieved by the DecreeandJudgment dated 29.08.2005 in A.S.No.58 of 2002 on the file ofthelearnedSeniorCivil Judge, Narsapur.
submissions and without going into the 4. Considering the above this Court feels that cause of action in this correctness of the submission matter does not survive and deems fit to dismiss thisappeal. 5. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed. shall stand 6. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal
closed.
SDI- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
TAC
A -
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/10/2024
JUDGMENT
SA.No.241 of 2006
anos^
£P
2 2 NOV 2D2'i
.\o
BoY
^ . Current Section ^
DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s B.V.Radha Ramana Gupta and Company
Allagadda Kiran Kumar
Allagadda Vijaya Kumar
T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court