High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the Land Grabbing Appeal for non-prosecution due to inability of the appellant's counsel to secure instructions from the absent appellant.
Land Grabbing Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
■f:
*5^
tr
.«r.'
& i:'
_ _
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
LAND GRABBING APPEAL NO: 32 OF ?niR
Appeal filed under Rule 16 (1), against the Special Court Under AP Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act at Hyderabad from the orders of the AP Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Tribunal (District Judge) at Guntur in LGOP No.12/2009, dt.25.07.2013.
Between:
Rehana Sulthana, son of Mohammed Muneer, Resident of Hat No. 105 Bramarambika Apartments, Gowthamnagar, Malkarjgiri Hyderabad Hyderabad City Civil Court Limits.
...Petitioner
AND
(Respondents 1 to 3 are residents of Venkateswara Colony (now unofficially named by the land grabbers) Besides RTC Colony , Old Guntur, Guntur JCJC)
...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. M. RAM PRASAD REPRESENTING
FOR SRI. K SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondents: ---
The Court made the following:
[3494]
V I
APHC010692152016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
LAND GRABBING APPEAL No.32 of 2016
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
against the Special Court Under AP Land Grabbing (Prohibition)Act at Hyderabad from the orders of the AP Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Tribunal (District Judge) at Guntur in LGOP No.12/2009,dt.25.07.2013
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.KSRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondents:
2
LGA 32 2016
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
At the time of considering the matter, Mr.M.Ram Prasad,learned Advocate, representing the learned counsel for the appellant states that despite their best efforts, they could not secure instructionsfrom the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal.
- Hence, the Land Grabbing Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- P VENKATA RAMANA JOINT REGISTRAR
To
SECTION OFFICER
PR
sree
HIGH COURT
DATED:18/10/2024
JUDGMENT
LGA.No.32 of 2016
ANO>y^
5 2 2 JAN 2025 Co,
. Current Section
DISMISSING THE L.G.A. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
REHANA SULTHANA
SRUNGAVARAPU RAJYA LAKSHMI AND OTHERS
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
NINALA JAYASURYA
SUMATHI JAGADAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
