A land grabbing appeal against a Tribunal decision was dismissed because the appellants, though listed for dismissal and unrepresented, did not prosecute the appeal; no costs ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY. THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
honourable SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND
honourable smt justice SUMATHI JAGADAM
LAND GRARRIKiq APPFAI Mn30 OF 2016
Appeal filed under Section 7A(3) B/w Rule 16 (1) of Andhra Pradesh Land Grading (Prohibition) Act, 1982, to set aside the judgment and order dt. 31-12-2012 of the A.P. Land Grabing Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Guntur made in LGOP.NO. 2/2010 with costs throughout and to pass such other order or orders that are deemed fit and under the circumstances of the proper case in the interests of Justice.
Between:
...Appellants / Applicants AND
1- P Daniel, Aged 39 years. Daily Labourer
2. Nune Jyothi Raju,, aged 38
years, Christian, Labourer
District.
...Respondents / Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. RAMAKRISHNA RAO KOMMINENI
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. T S N MURTHY
The Court made the following:
♦4 APHC010403732016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3494] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
LAND ORARBING APPEAL No.30 of 2016
Between:
1.T SESHAGIRIRAO, GUNTUR DIST & 5 OTHERS, AGED 58
YEARS,
2
LGA 30 2016
To set aside the judgment and order dt.31-12-2012 of the A.P. Land Grading Tribunal (PrI. District Judge), Guntur made in LGOP.NO. 2/2010 with costs throughout and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioners:
1. RAMAKRISHNA RAO KOMMINENI
Counsel for the Respondents:
1.TS N MURTHY
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
Though the appeal is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. It appears that they are not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
SD/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER To J 1. The Andhra Pradesh Land Grading Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Guntur
PR
sree
high court DATED:18/10/2024
JUDGMENT
LGA.No.30 of 2016
DISMISSING THE L.G.A. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T Seshagiri Rao
Tadikonda Venkateswararao
Tadikonda Ramakoteswararao (died)
Tadikonda Kanakadurga
Tadikonda Satyasai
Tadikonda Shanmukha
Ninala Jayasurya
Sumathi Jagadam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
