The High Court dismissed an appeal suit filed under Section 96 of CPC without representation from the appellant, deeming him not interested in pursuing the matter. No costs awarded.
Matter dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
<br>
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
<br>
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
FIRST APPEAL NO: 132 OF 2018
Appeal filed under section 96 of CPC., against the Judgment and Decree dated 31-10-2017 in OS.No. 28 of 2015 passed by theX Additional District Jugde, West Godavari District at Narsapur.
Between:
Penumatsa Surapa Raju, S/o.Late Satyanaraya Raju, aged about 61 years, Occ: Business, R/o.3E, Dhuvatara Apartments, Behind Medinova Hospital, Rajbhavan Road, Hyderabad
...Appellant/Defendant No.1
AND
...Respondent/Plaintiff
years, Occ: House-wife Palakol, West Godavari District
...Respondent/Respondent
lA NO: 1 OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto stay of all further proceedings in executing the JudgmentandDecreedt.31-10- 2017 passed in OS.No. 28 of 2015 on the file of theXAdditionalDistrictJudge, Narsapur pending disposal of the main appeal
Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. Venkat Rao Patil
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri Rama Mohan Palanki
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Sri M Prudhvi Raju
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
[3494]
/
APHC011027312017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
APPEAL SUIT No.132 of 2018
Between:
AND
Setting aside the judgment and decree dated 31-10-2017 in OS. at No.28 of 2015 passed by the X Addl. District Judge, WG District Narsapur and pass
lA NO: 1 OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmay be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in executingthejudgment and decree dt.31-10-2017 passed in OS. No.28 of 2015onthefileofthe
i
X Addl. District Judge, Narsapur pending disposal of the main appeal and pass
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.VENKAT RAO PAUL
Counsel for the Respondents:
1.RAMA MOHAN PALANKI
2.PRUDHVI RAJ MUDUNURI
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
Though the appeal is listed under the caption “For Dismissal there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal.
- Hence, the appeal suit is dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
SAM
vna
HIGH COURT DATED: 16/10/2024
JUDGMENT
AS. No. 132 of 2018
m
g 2 6 our 202'|
ri
^ . Curreiii aecuo**
DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Penumatsa Surapa Raju
Penumatsa Surya Padmavathi and Another
Ninala Jayasurya
Sumathi Jagadam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
