Civil revision petition against an order in an interlocutory application in a suit at Kakinada. Counsel stated that due to subsequent developments no cause of action survived; the High Court dismissed the revision as infructuous, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
S’,
O (i
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 483fi OF 9nig V
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, filed against the Order and Decree made i in I.A.No.424 of 2016 in O.S.No.831 of 2008 dated 08-07-2016 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
Between:
Puligedda Anjaneyulu, S/o Late Sri Surya Rao, Hindu. Age 62 years, Occ; Cultivation. R/o. Seela - 533 263 Kajuluru Mandal, East Godavari District
...PETITIONER/PETITIONER
AND
Puligedda Veeranna Siddanti, S/o. Sri ‘ Satyanarayanacharyulu, R/o. Seela - 533 263, Kajuluru Mandal, East Godavari District.
...RESPONDENT
LA. NO: 1 OF2016fCRPMP Mn- 6296 OF2niR)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of the operation of the Decree and Judgment made in
A
OS NO.831 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada, dated 31.12.2008 pending disposal of the present CRP.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N. SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent; SRI E VV S RAVI KUMAR
The Court made the following:
N I m
r
APHC010341792016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3460] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4836/2016 ,
Between:
Puligedda Anjaneyulu, E.g.dist
...PETITIONER
AND
Puligedda Veeranna Siddanti E G Dist
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.N SIVA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent:
TEWS RAVI KUMAR
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
C.R.P.No.4836 of 2016
ORDER:
The present revision is filed against the order dated 08.07.2016 in I.A.No.424 of 2016 in O.S.No.831 of 2008 passed by the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada.
that in view of the subsequent developments, no causeofaction survives for adjudication in the revision petition.
- Recording the said submission, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- P.U.V.BHASKARA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
nm
HIGH COURT
DATED: 11/09/2024
ORDER
CRP.No.4836 of 2016
% 2 2 NOV 202^ ^
-ft/
^ . Current Section . ^
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS
1 issue framed by the court
Should the civil revision petition proceed given subsequent developments rendering the cause of action non-existent?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Puligedda Anjaneyulu
Puligedda Veeranna Siddanti
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
