In a civil revision petition filed against an order in a consumer complaint, the court found that subsequent developments rendered the petition infructuous and dismissed it.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous applications to be closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010476692017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3460]
WEDNESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3619/2017
Between:
Bakki Israel Karunakar, Srikakulam Dist & Another and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
Tammineni Narayana Rao Srikakulam Dist
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.Y NARAPA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.V S R ANJANEYALU
The Court made the following:
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3619/2017
ORDER:
Aggrieved by the Order dated 09.03.2017 in CMA No. 22 of 2016 passed by the IV Additional District Judge, Srikakulam, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.
the light of subsequent developments, the issue in the Civil Revision Petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, no further orders are necessary in this Petition.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J
Date: 11-09-2024
eha
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CRP No. 3619 of 2017
Dt.11-09-2024
eha
U
Bakki Israel Karunakar & Another
Tammineni Narayana Rao
Nyathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
