Burre Raju v. Neelam Papamani
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner instructed counsel not to press the civil revision petition. The High Court recorded the instruction and dismissed the petition as not pressed.
The petitioner instructed counsel not to press the civil revision petition. The High Court recorded the instruction and dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 135 OF 2024
V
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Aggrieved by the order dated 08.01.2024 passed in E.P.No.9 of 2022 in O.S.No.74 of 2018 by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Peddapuram.
Between:
Burre Raju, S/o Surya Rao, aged 68 years. Business and Agriculture, resident of D.No.2-143, Pedda Ramalayam Street, Goneda Village in Kirlampudi Mandal, Prathipadu D.M.C.
...Petitioner/J.Dr./Defendant
AND
Neelam Papamani, W/o Venkatasatyanarayana Murthy, aged 70 years. Housewife, D.No.2-78, Chinna Ramalayam Street, Goneda Village in Kirlampudi Mandal, Prathipadu D.M.C.
...Respondent/D.Hr./Plaintiff
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No.9 of 2022 in of
%
O.S.No.74 of 2018, on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Peddapuram, pending the above Civil Revision Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. P Rajasekhar
i a
t
^^6unsel for the Respondent: None Appeared
4
The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 135 of 2024
JUDGMENT:
Sri P. Rajasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner,submitsthathehas
instructions from the petitioner to not press the present revision petition.
pressed'.
To.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in - SD/- M SRINIVAS assistant registrar
consequence. -
//true copy//
c/t^ CTION OFFICER
SAM
sree
HIGH COURT DATED:28/02/2024
ORDER
CRP.No.135 of 2024
5 0 IJUL 202^
V^gSPATCne^
DISMISSING THE CRP AS NOT PRESSED
Burre Raju
Neelam Papamani
Ravi Nath Tilhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court