The Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati bencli disposed of Contempt Case No. 4564 of 2023. Observing compliance with the earlier writ order, the Court discharged notices and dismissed the contempt proceedings without costs.
The contempt case is dismissed; notices to respondents are discharged; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY V TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4564 OF 2023
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for willful violation of the final orders of this Hon'ble Court in WP 12532 of 2020 dated 25.03.2022.
Between:
Pallam Ramanaiah, S/o Prakasam Aged 48 Years Occ; VRA, R/o Iskapalem, Buchircddypalem (M) SPS Nellore District. ...Petitioner
AND
%
...Respondents
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Rule 18 of Contempt of Courts Rules praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to discharge the Respondent No.3 from the array of respondents in the Contempt Case No.4564 of 2023 and close the contempt case against this Respondent.
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Rule 18 of Contempt of Courts Rules praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to discharge the Respondent No. 1 from the array of respondents in Contempt Case No. 4564 of 2023 and close the contempt case against this Respondent.
lA NO: 3 OF 2023
Petition under Rule 18 of Contempt of Courts Rules praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to discharge the Respondent No.2 from the array of respondents in the Contempt case No.4564 of 2023 and close the contempt case against this Respondent.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Pamarthy Rathnakar
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 & 3: Sri G V S Kishore Kumar
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Sri. P Subash
The Court made the following:
I I
APHC0102S6312023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3299]
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4564 OF 2023
Between:
PALLAM RAMANAIAH ...PETITIONER(S)
AND G SAI PRASAD IAS AND OTHERS ...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. PAMARTHY RATHNAKAR
Counsel for the Respondents: G V S KISHORE KUMAR
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
On 25.09.2023, the following order was passed:
“Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted two (02) weeks time to file the reply affidavit. 2. Learned counsels for the respondents submits that the order of the Writ Court has been complied with. 3. List on 09.10.2023”.
- There is no representation for the petitioner.
- There is nothing on record contrary to the submissionasmadeon 25.09.2023.
- This Court is of the view that it is now not necessary to proceed further in the Contempt Case, due to compliance with the Writ Court’s order.
- The notice issued to the respondents are discharged.
? i
6. The Contempt Case is dismissed.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if anypending,shallalso
stand closed.
SD/- M.S.V.NAVEEN CHANDRA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTION OFFICER
SNS
sree
HIGH COURT
DATED: 23/02/2024
ORDER
CC.No.4564 of 2023
DISMISSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS
r« U
ar'!
? 1 AUG 202'» ^ ^
& ^ Current Section
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt case needs to proceed given compliance with the earlier writ order.
Whether the notice issued to the respondents should be discharged.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PALLAM RAMANAIAH
G SAI PRASAD
M. HARINARAYANA
M PADMAJA
RAVI NATH TILHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
