In a contempt case, the appellant submitted that the respondent had paid the disputed amount. The Court accepted this submission, found the writ order complied, and closed the contempt proceedings.
Notices to respondents discharged and pending petitions closed; contempt case terminated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
o
o
the honourable SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARlt^o^!^^
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5837 OF 2023
Contempt case U/s.10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to Punish the Respondents herein for willfully violating, disobeying the orders of the High Court dated 02.05.2023 in W.P.No.33649 of 2022.
Between;
Mamidala Bhaskar, S/o. Venkaiah Aged about 53 years Occ Contractor Pathakuchipudi Palli, Kanigiri Mandal, Prakasam District. /. r . ...Petitioner
AND
Prakasam District. Ongole
f
Prakasam District Ongole. Engineer in Chief Public
Health Tadepalli, Guntur District.
Prakasam District.
Nagara Panchayat Kanigiri, Prakasam District.
- Sri D.V.S Narayana Rao, S/o. Not known. The Commissioner, Nagara Panchayat Kanjgjn, Kanigiri Village and Mandal Prakasam District.
...Respondents
lA NO: 1 OF 209^
stated'in'ihr circumstances s ated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be 2K3 in W P N''^"t®..o'"' “P'' dated 02-05^023 in W.P.No.33649 of 2022.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATESWARLU GADA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,6: SMT. S NISCHALA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2,7,8: SRI B.S. SHIVAJI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4,9,10: SRI Y. KANAKALINGESWARA
RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
CONTEMPT CASE No. 5837 of 207-^
JUDGMENT:
Sri C. Suman, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent,submits that in addition to the part payment of Rs. 25,03,000/- paid on 13.02.2024, an amount of Rs.24,51,000/- has also been released in favour of the petitioner on 23.02.2024, i.e., today itself. He submits that the order of the Writ Court is complied in its entirety.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in consequence.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-M RAMESH BABU „ DEPUTY REGISTRAR d
SECTION OFFICER
To,
f
sree
HIGH COURT
DATED;23/02/2024
ORDER
CC.No.5837 of 2023
IT Copfe5 Zoht-lzif DSL-
closing THE CONTEMPT CASE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceedings should be concluded upon the submission regarding payment compliance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mamidala Bhaskar
Sri Shamsher Singh Rawat
Ravi Nath Tilhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
