Dismissed

G.Veera Babu v. State SHO

Andhra Pradesh HC5 Feb 2024CRLP/631/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismisses a criminal petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous. The court relied on the petitioner's representation that the matter had become infructuous and thus closed all related applications.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions pending thereunder closed.

G.Veera Babu Vs State SHO — Quashing and FIR | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT>r<^

¶3

TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 631 OF 2019

¶7

Between:

¶8

G.Veera Babu, S/o Krishna, Aged about 35 years, Hindu, R/o Nookalamma Temple Street, Patha Suravaram, Tuni, E.G.District.

¶9

Vangalapudi Guru Ganesh, S/o Ramana, Hindu, Aged about 26 years, R/o Vangalapudi Vari Street, Patha Suravaram, Tuni, East Godavari^District.

¶10

...Petitioners/Accused Nos.4&5

¶11

AND

¶12

The State, SHO, Tuni Town Police Station, rep. by its public prosecutor. High Court of AP, Amaravathi

¶13

D.Govind, S/o Nageswara Rao, Hindu, S.C. Mala, Aged about 25 years Veeravarapu Peta, Tuni Town, E.G. District

¶14

...Respondents

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in^{thecircumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the criminal proceedings of FIR in Crime no. 8 of 2019 on the file of the Tuni Town Police Station, East Godavari District.

¶16

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2019

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the arrest of petitioner/accused Nos.4,5 in FIR in crime No.8/2019 dated 16-01-2019 on the file of the Tuni Police Station, East Godavari District till the disposal of Main Criminal Petition.

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum^of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1.

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

• C!

¶21

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITION No.631 OF 2019

¶23

ORDER;

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioners represented that^the matter has become infructuous and also endorsed the same on the bundle.

¶25

In view of the said representation, nothing survives^inthe

¶26

present Criminal Petition.

¶27

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶28

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending^inthis

¶29

criminal petition shall stand closed.

¶30

SD/- U SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶31

//TRUE COPY//

¶32

SECTION OFFICER

¶33

To. 1. The Station House Officer, Tuni Police Station, East Godavari District. 2. One CC to Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi fOUTl 4. Three CD Copies sree

HIGH COURT

DATED:06/02/2024

ORDER

CRLP.No.631 of 2019

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

G.Veera Babu v. State SHO

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Veera Babu v. State SHO

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Venkatesh Alias Venkateash Vs State of Ap

P..N.Durga Prasad Vs State of Ap

Chirf Manger Vs State of Ap

V.Ramprasad Vs State of Ap

Sujatha Boddu Vs State of Ap

K.Koteswara Rao Vs State of Ap