Petitioners sought quashing of proceedings in SC No.45/2018 under Sections 364, 376, 302, 201, 404 and 120(b) r/w 34 IPC. Counsel for the petitioners stated the matter had become infructuous, and the court dismissed the criminal petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
FRIDAY .THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 443 OF 2019
Between:
Petitioners are R/o Jeevarakshanagar, Desaipeta, VetapalameMandal Prakasam District (Accused 4 & 5)
...Petitioners
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds ofCriminalPetition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the recordsinPRC43/2018on the file of the Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Chirala Prakasam District for offence punishable under section 364, 376, 302,201,404,120(b)r/w34
IPC and quash the same as the same is illegal contrarytolawandabuse of the process of law.
f
\X m: 2jt)F.2019
' Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in PRC 43/2018 on the file of the Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Chirala, Prakasam District including the personal appearance of the petitioners pending disposal of the criminal petition
LA. NO: 3 OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to amend the prayer ascallfortherecords in SC No. 45 of 2018 on the file of the II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District for offences punishable U/s. 364, 376, 302, 201, 404, 120(b) r/w 34 of IPC and quash the same as the same is illegal, contrary to law and abuse of the process of Law.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Thota Ramakoteswara Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Y. Nagi Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.443 OF 2019
ORDER;
The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Learned counsel endorsed the
same on the bundle.
In view of the same, the present Criminal Petition ISi dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendinginthis
Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
SECTION OFFICER
1.' The II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ongole.
sree
HIGH COURT DA«6b;09/02/2024
0 . •• :«’
ORDER
CRLP.No.443 of 2019
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Lavanya
V. Jhosna
The State of AP, Vetapalem Rural P.S., Vetapalem, Prakasam District
S.Prabhakara Reddy
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
