Dismissed
Y Venkat Rao v. State of Ap
Andhra Pradesh HCCRLP/29/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY .THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 29 OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in F.I.R.No.84/2018 Dt.19.03.2018 on the file of P.S., Gannavaram.
Between:
Yarlagadda Venkata Rao, S/o. Seshagiri Rao, aged about 45 years, R/o. Penumancha Village, Vuyyuru Mandal, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh.
...Petitioner/Accused No.1
AND
...Respondent/Defacto-Complainant
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in F.I.R.No.84/201 8 Dt.19.03.2018 on the file of P.S., Gannavaram, pending disposal of the above Criminal petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri KIRAN BABU TAGARAM .Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appearing for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
/ /
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.29 OF 2019
ORDER;
Despite the matter being posted under the dismissal caption, there is no representation for the petitioner.
Therefore, it evinces that the petitioner has no interestto prosecute the case. Hence, the present Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendinginthis
Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- M SRINIVAS assistant REC^ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// rK//
-^-^SECTI^ ofpiCER
To, -^-^SECTI^ ofpiCER 1. The Station House Officer, Gannavaram District. Police Station, Gannavaram. Krishna 3 Two rritofh' Tagaram, Advocate [OPUC] ■ Arararati " High Court of Andhra Pradesh at 4. Three CD Copies VNA
KtflCM No.g
HIGH COURT DATED:29/01/2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.29 of 2019
DISMISSING THE CRLP FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Yarlagadda Venkata Rao
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Jujjavarapu Lokeswara Rao
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court