In this criminal petition seeking quashing of FIR and stay of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the Assistant Prosecutor noted a charge sheet had been filed. The High Court disposed of the petition and allowed the petitioner to assail the charge sheet if aggrieved. Pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 114 OF 2019
Between:
Kandru Dayanandam, S/o Veeraiah aged 59 years, Occ. MPDO Bangarupalyam Mandal, Chittoor District, R/o Bangarupalyam Mandal Chittoor District
...Petitioner/Accused-2
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in FIR in Crime No.26/2015 on thefile of SHO PS Nizampatnam, Guntur District against the petitioner/A2.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant stay of all further proceedings against the petitioner/A2 including arrest and appearance of the petitioner in FIR in Crime No.26/2015 pending on the file of SHO PS Nizampatnam, Guntur District. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ch Srinivas, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.ll4 OF 2019
ORDER:
No representation for the petitioner.
The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the present criminal petition is filed seeking to quash the FIR and subsequently, the police had laid a charge sheet after due investigation before the concerned court.
In view of the said representation made by learnedAssistant Public Prosecutor, the present Criminal Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner/accused is at liberty to assail the charge sheet, if at all the petitioner/accused is aggrieved.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition shall stand closed.
SDI- K J RAJA BABU
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
SVR sree
y
/
HIGH COURT
DATED:29/01/2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.114 of 2019
DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION
ie^ D3>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the proceedings in FIR Crime No.26/2015 may be quashed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C given that a charge sheet was filed after investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kandru Dayanandam
The State of AP
P Ganapthi
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
