M.Abdullah v. State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
The Criminal Petition was closed after the parties compromised the matter before the Lok Adalath under Section 320(8) Cr.P.C., resulting in the quashing of proceedings. No order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed; proceedings in FIR No. 466/2018 are to be treated as quashed by way of compromise before Lok Adalath.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
L
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V SUJATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2368 OF 2019
Between:
Mohamad Abdullah,s/o Irfan Aged32 years Employee in steel Plant, Visakhapatnam,
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED N0.1
AND
- The State of AP, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi
- Mohammad Salmabanu,w/o MD Abdullah, aged 28 years, 446-6/1, Rahamahendravaram, E.G.District
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohamad Abdullah
- respondent
State of AP
Coram
Justice V Sujatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/2368/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court