The High Court, upon learning from the State Prosecutor that the main matter was posted for examination of accused, declined to adjudicate the interim stay petition. The main criminal petition was dismissed for lack of instructions from the party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 14062 OF 2018
Between:
...Petitioner/Accused 2 to 5
AND
...Respondent/Defacto Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that inthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC.No.546 of 2018, on the file of the Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kavali, SPSRNelloreDistrict.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioners in CC.No.546 of 2018, in so far as A-2 to A-5 are concerned, on the file of the Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kavali, SPSR Nellore District, pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition in the interest of justice.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sri K. Sandeep for Sri M Ravindra, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri M S G Raveena, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.l4062 OF 2018
ORDER:
Sri K.Sandeep, learned counsel represented on behalfofSri M.Ravindra, learned counsel for the petitioners andsubmitted that there are no instructions from the party and the Court may pass an appropriate order.
Learned Special Assistant Public Prosecutor submittedthat
the matter is posted for the examination of the accused.
Therefore, at this stage this Court is declined to adjudicate
the matter. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendinginthis
criminal petition shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,1
SECTION OFFICER
voe<?o
HIGH COURT DATED:09/01/2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.14062 of 2018
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION
O'
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anala Govindaiah and others
The State of A.P. and others
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
