The Water Users Association v. Sri Sasi Bhushan Kumar IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt case closed as respondents complied with prior orders.
Contempt case closed as respondents complied with prior orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVA^VMO "X
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBE
Iksd I
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
% 4^
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 749 OF 2024
under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971topunishthe respondents herein for wilfully violating and disobeyingthe order in WP No 24465/2021 dated 29.11.2023
Between:
THE WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, Vegayammapeta. Rep. byitsPresident, Garapati Surya Satyanarayana, S/o. Padma Raju, Agedabout62years,Occ Contractor, R/o. D.No. 1-37, Vegayammapeta village, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, East Godavari District
...PETITIONER
AND
/ i
...CONTEMNORS
Counsel for the Petitioner(s);SRI. ANNAMNEEDl BALAKRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1,3,4,5 : SRI. S SIVAKUMARI
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI. C. SUMAN
The Court made the following; ORDER
y
APHC010658722023
t / /
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3233]
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 749/2024
Between:
M. Naga Venkateswara Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO:749/2024
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 29.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.24465 of 2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 29.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.24465 of 2021 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt
case shall stand closed.
SD/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
C SECTION OFFICER
To,
I
r
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:21/11/2024
ORDER
CC.No.749 of 2024
I 2 8 FEB 2025
Current Section . ^
^!£Espatch*5-?
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Naga Venkateswara Reddy
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court