Contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of an earlier writ order regarding payment. Both sides reported compliance and the court closed the contempt case with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMA'^DDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 599 OF 2024
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of CourtsAct 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents UnderSection10to12of Contempt of Courts Act for their willful disobedience of Order Dt. 08.11.2023 passed in W.P No. 6692 of 2023 on the file of this Hon’ble Court
Between;
S.Siddha Muni, S/o. Srecram Munirathnam. Aged 59 Years. Occ Janmabhooini Mavvooru Committee Member, R/o. Bhakarapeta Village, Chinnagottigallu Mand#, f irupathi [district.'. f.' \ ,
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI NIMMAGADDA REVATHI
Counsel for the Respondents R1 : SMT S SIVA KUMARI
Counsel for the Respondents No 2 to 6 : NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following ORDER :
1 i
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGAPnA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 599 of 2024
ORDER
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 08.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.6692 of 2023.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that as per the orders of this Court, payment was made to the petitioner and the orders of this Court are compliedwith.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also admitted the same.
In view of the compliance reported by both the parties, no cause survives for further adjudication of the matter. Hence, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
SDI- K.TATA RAO
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
TAC
HIGH COURT
DATED:03/07/2024
ORDER
CC.No.599 of 2024
CLOSING THIS CONTEMPT CASE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Siddha Muni
Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Principal Secretary to Government, Irrigation and Command Area Development Department
Sri S.S. Rawat, Principal Secretary to Government, Finance and Planning
Sri Chinnaganta Narayana Reddy, Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department
Sri K. Venkata Ramana Reddy, District Collector, Tirupathi
Sri Vijay Kumar Reddy, Superintendent Engineer, Water Resources Department
Venkateswarlu Nimma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
