Dismissed

Shaik Chand Basha v. Sashi Bhusan Kumar IAS

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Jul 2024CC/390/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt case filed for wilful disobedience of an order dated 27.11.2023, the court found that the respondents had complied with the said order. Consequently, the court closed the contempt case without passing further orders or costs.

What did the court decide?

The contempt case is closed. No costs are awarded. Any pending miscellaneous petitions in the case are closed.

Shaik Chand Basha Vs Sashi Bhusan Kumar IAS — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY

¶2

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 390 OF 2024

¶5

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to issue summons to the Respondents upon due enquiry may be pleased to punish the Respondents for their willful disobedience of order dated 27.11.2023 passed in Writ Petition No 20822 of 2023.

¶6

Between:

¶7

Shaik Chand Basha, S/o Shaik Gaffor Saheb, Aged about⁴⁸ years, R/o D.No. 749, Nadigadda, Nandyal, Kumool District. ...Petitioner

¶8

AND

¶9

Sashi Bhusan Kumar IAS, Principal Secretary to Government of A.P, Water Resource Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.

¶10

S. S. Rawat, I.A.S, Principal Secretary to Government of A.P, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.

¶11

Dr. Srijana, I.A.S, District Collector, Kumool District.

¶12

Reddy Sekhar Reddy, Superintendent Engineer, Irrigation and Command Area Development, Irrigation Circle, Nandyal, Kumool District.

¶13

B. Raghurami Reddy, Executive Engineer, M.l Works Division, Water Resource Department, Nandyal, Kumool District.

¶14

...Respondents

¶15

Counsel for the Petitioner.SRI. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondents No. 1,3,4 & 5:SMT S. SIVA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI C. SUMON

¶16

The Court made the following:

¶17

APHC010035692024

¶18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶19

[3329]

¶20

WEDNESDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶21

PRESENT

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶23

Between:

¶24

Shaik Chand Basha

¶25

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 390/2024

...PETITIONER

AND

Sashi Bhusan Kumar las and Others

¶31

...CONTEMNOR{S)

¶32

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶33

1.SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI

¶34

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶35

1.S SIVA KUMARI

¶36

2.C SUMON

¶37

The Court made the following:

¶38

ORDER:

¶39

This contempt case is filed against the Respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 27.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.20822 of 2023.

¶40

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Respondents have complied with the orders dated

¶41

27.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.20822 of 2023 and hence , no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt^case.

¶42

Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs.

¶43

Consequently. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt

¶44

case shall stand closed.

¶45

¶46

SD/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

Sashi Bhusan Kumar IAS, Principal Secretary to Government of A.P, Water Resource Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.

¶51

S. S. Rawat, I.A.S, Principal Secretary to Government of A.P, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati,^Guntur District.

¶52

Dr. Srijana, I.A.S, District Collector, Kumool District. 4. Reddy Sekhar Reddy, Superintendent Engineer, Irrigation^and Command Area Development, Irrigation Circle, Nandyal,^Kurnool District.

¶53

B. Raghurami Reddy, Executive Engineer, M.l Works Division,^Water Resource Department, Nandyal, Kumool District.

¶54

One CC to SRI. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI, Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to SMT. S. SIVA KUMARI, Advocate [OPUC] 8. One CC to SRI. C. SUMON, Advocate [OPUC] 9. Three C.D.Copies nm

¶55

HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2024

¶56

ORDER

¶57

CC.No.390 of 2024

¶58

■p
o
o
2 0 .';fp Sa
A-S-
•k

¶59

CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED

Shaik Chand Basha v. Sashi Bhusan Kumar IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaik Chand Basha v. Sashi Bhusan Kumar IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vatsavaya Subhadra Rani Vs the Union of India

T.V. Sridevi Vs The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation

Chakka Suryanarayana Vs Union of India

Shaik Chand Basha Vs Sashi Bhushan Kumar IAS

Pogula Sudheer Reddy Vs Sashi Bhusan Kumar IAS

Shaik Chand Basha Vs Sashi Bhusan Kumar IAS