Petitioners' claim had been settled out of court; counsel sought withdrawal of the writ petition. Permission was granted and the petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010011222024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3329]
TUESDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 792/2024
Between:
Vatsavaya Subhadra Rani and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The Union Of India and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 792 of 2024
ORDER:
Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the claim of the petitioners was resolved out of the Court, no cause survives for further adjudication of the matter and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
09.07.2024 TPS
146
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 792 of 2024
09.07.2024 TPS
Vatsavaya Subhadra Rani and Others
The Union Of India
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
