A contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, was dismissed because counsels submitted that the respondents complied with the order dated 08.12.2023, closing the case with no costs.
The contempt case closed. No further orders required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
►Y
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE No.386 OF 2024
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to issue summons to the Respondents upon due enquiry may be pleased to punish the Respondents for contempt of court under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for their willful disobedience of order dated 08.12.2023 passed in Writ Petition No.20171 of 2023. Between:
Pogula Sudheer Reddy, S/o. P. Tulasi Reddy, Aged about 38 years R/o. Main Road, Yalluru, Kurnool District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 4 & 5 : SMT S SIVAKUMARI
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI C SUMON
The Court made the following ORDER :
APHC010036662024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3329]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 386/2024
Between;
Pogula Sudheer Reddy ...PETITIONER
AND
Sashi Bhusan Kumar las and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
...CONTEMNOR{S)
1.SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.S SIVA KUMARI
2.C SUMON
The Court made the following; ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the Respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 08.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.20171 of 2023.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Respondents have compliedwiththeordersdated
further orders are required to be passed in the contemptcase.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case isclosed.Nocosts.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt
case shall stand closed.
SD/- E.KAMESWARA RAO f !: DEPUTY REGISTRAR I
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:10/07/2024
ORDER
CC.No.386 of 2024
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
/
J
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for punishment for contempt is maintainable when the respondents have complied with the impugned order.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Pogula Sudheer Reddy
Sashi Bhusan Kumar
S. S. Rawat
Dr. Srijana
Reddy Sekhar Reddy
B Raghurami Reddy
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
