Petitioner filed contempt petition for disobedience of interim order dated 17.02.2022. Court recorded submission of compliance and closed the contempt case with liberty to initiate separate proceedings if any further claim arises.
Contempt case closed with liberty to file separate proceedings for further claim if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
o
|0
to. Oy
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 385 OF 2023
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to take cognizance of the contempt committed by the Contemnors/Respondents herein and punish them with maximum imprisonment under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for utter disobedience and disregard shown to the Interim Order passed by the Hon'ble A.P. High Court dated 17.02.2022 passed in I.A. No. 1 of 2022 in W.P. No. 159 of 2022.
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
r
...RESPONDENTS/CONTEMNORS
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to discharge the Respondent No. 3 from thearrayofrespondents in the Contempt Case No. 385 of 2023 dated 05-05-2023.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASA RAO NARRA
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 ; SMT S NISCHALA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents No.3, 4, 5 &-6 : SMT SSIVAKUMARI
The Court made the following ORDER :
APHC010027822023
•I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3329]
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 385/2023
Between:
Raminidi Ramanjaneyulu ...PETITIONER
AND
Shashi Bhushan Kumar I A S and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
...CONTEMNOR(S)
.f i
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
2.S NISCHALA REDDY 3.S SIVA KUMARI 4.S SIVA KUMARI 5.S SIVA KUMARI
The Court made the following:
ORDER
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwillfuldisobedience of the orders dated 17.02.2022 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.159 of 2022.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner ^ submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 17.02.2022^ passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.159 of 2022. and hence no \ further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission the Contempt Case is closed, granting liberty to the petitioner for initiating separate proceedings for further claim if any. No order as to costs.
Consequently. Miscellaneous Petitions if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- A.VIJAYBABU assistant registrar SECTION OFFICER
Veiagapudi, Guntur District.
^ /
/ / 1
TAC
HIGH COURT
DATED; 24/04/2024
ORDER
CC.No.385 of 2023
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceedings should continue given the compliance of the respondents with the impugned orders
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Raminidi Ramanjaneyulu
Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar
Sri Shamsher Singh Rawat
Sri M. Venu Gopal Reddy
Sri Umamaheswara Rao
Sri Y. Srihari
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
