Petitioner filed a contempt petition for willful disobedience of an order dated 24.11.2023. Respondents submitted that the order was complied with. Petitioner confirmed compliance. Court closed the contempt case.
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs; appearance of Respondents 3 and 4 dispensed with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
3
iO Ik
.Os-.i
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 282 OF 2024
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondentsin terms of Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully disobeying/violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.NO. 18694 of 2023, dated 24-11-2023 passed by Hon'ble Sri Justice Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda.
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
111? mA Ramaiah, S/o. late D. 4. D. Venkata ' A -/r-: Kadapa, YSR District. f.
Rangaiah, Executive Engineer, WRD,
...respondents/contemnors
\f\ QF 2024
151 CPC praying that in the circumstances Petition under Section , the High Court may be stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition of the Judgment in WP with filing of the certified copy pleased to dispense in the interest of No. 18694 of 2023andproceedwiththecontemptcase justice.
; SRI RAHUL REDDY CHAGANTl Counsel for the Petitioner
: SMT S SIVA KUMARI the Respondent No.1 Counsel for
Respondent No.2 ; SRI C SUMON Counsel for the
The Court made the following ORDER :
APHC010025372024
-a>
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3329]
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 282/2024
Between:
M. Rama Subba Reddy ...PETITIONER
AND
Sasi Busan Kumar las and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.S SIVA KUMARI
2.C SUMON
3.S SIVA KUMARI
4.S SIVA KUMARI
The Court made the following:
ORDER
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwillfuldisobedience of the orders dated 24.11.2023 passed by this CourtinW.P.No.18694of2023.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have compliedwiththeordersdated
24.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.18694 of 2023, and hence no furth orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also confirmed that the orders of this Court have been complied with.
In view of the same, appearance of respondent Nos.3 and 4 is hereby
dispensed with.
Recording the said submissions, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt
case shall stand closed.
SD/- A.VIJAY BABU
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
//SECTION OFFICER
To.
TAC
V
HIGH COURT
DATED: 23/04/2024
ORDER
CC.No.282 of 2024
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case should be closed as the respondents have complied with the earlier order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Rama Subba Reddy
Sasi Busan Kumar
K.V.V. Satya Narayana
Kamatam Srinivasulu
D. Venkata Ramaiah
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
