Dismissed

Tammenane Mahendra Srinivasulu, Anantapur Dist v. Nannur Mahendra Lalitha, Anantapur District & 11 Ots

Andhra Pradesh HC5 Dec 2024AS/795/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

First appeal concerning a decree in a civil suit; following settlement between the parties through intervention of elders, counsel sought withdrawal of the appeal. The High Court granted permission and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn at appellant's request after party settlement; no costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

Tammenane Mahendra Srinivasulu, Anantapur Dist Vs… — Property and Title | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶2

FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶7

APPEAL SUIT NO: 795 OF 2010

¶8

Appeal filed under section 96 of C.P.C., aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S No. 105 of 2005 dated 08.09.2010.

¶9

Between:

¶10

Tammenane Mahendra Srinivasulu, S/o. Late Tammenane Mahendra Naga Sayanam, Mentally disabled Under the care and custody of wife guardian T.M. Sarala, aged about 25 years, R/o. Door No. 16/112, SLV Road Guntakal Town & Mandal,

¶11

...Appellant/1®* Defendant

¶12

AND

¶13

Nannur Mahendra Lalitha, D/o. Late T.M. Nagasayanam, (W/o. N.M. Ramakrishna), aged about 41 years. Housewife, R/o. at D.No. 16/220, Mahendra Street, Guntakal Town and Mandal, Anantapur^District.

¶14

...Respondent/Plaintiff

¶15

Polenalli Mahendra Gouri, D/o. Late Tammenani Mahendra Nagasayanam, (W/o. P.M. Shekanna) aged about 44 years. Housewife,

¶16

residing tc D.No. 16/112, S.L.V. Road, Guntakal Town and Mandal,

¶17

"A^nantapur District.

¶18

Nannur Mahendra Nagarathana, D/o. Late Tammenani Mahendra Nagasayanam, (W/o. N.M. Narendra), aged about 33 years.^Housewife residing at D.No. 16/226, Mahendra Street, Guntakal Town and Mandal, Anantapur District.

¶19

Polapalli Mahendra Geetha, D/o. Late Tammenani Mahendra Nagasavanam, (W/o. P.M. Sreenivasulu) aged about 41 years, residing at D.No. 17/890, Guntakal Town Mandal, Anantapur District.

¶20

G. Chandra, S/o. Rangappa, Prop: A.C. Arts Photo Studio, aged about 47 years, D.No. 16/108A2, SLV Road, Guntakal Town and Mandal.

¶21

Dr. Sudhakara Reddy, S/o. Venkata Subba Reddy, Sri Srirama Dental Clinic, D.No. 16/108A2, SLV Road, Guntakal Town and Mandal.

¶22

Nanda Krishore Kama, S/o. Pruthviraj Kama, aged^about 51 years D.No. 16/108A2, SLV Road, Guntakal Town and Mandal, Anantapur District.

¶23

Chimbili Ramesh, S/o. Cimbili Suryanarayana, Prop: Sri Sirdi Sai Enterprises, aged about 41 years, D.No. 16/112, SLV Road, Guntakal Town and Mandal.

¶24

B. Ramanjaneyulu, S/o. Bandaru Sanjappa, Prop: S.N.G Enterprises, Hind, Major, aged about 41 years, D.No. 16/112, SLV Road, Guntakal Town and Mandal.

¶25

10.K. Sudhakara, S/o. K. Seshaiah Achari, aged about 50 years. Business D.No. 16/112, SLV Road, Guntakal Town and Mandal

¶26

Dr. Sarojamma, D/o. Konda Reddy, aged about 50 years, D.No. 16/112 SLV Road, Guntakal Town and Mandal.

¶27

12.Anand, S/o. Santhaiah, Prop: Sai Surya Enterprises, aged about 48 years, D.No. 16/112, SLV Road, Guntakal Town and Mandal.

¶28

...Respondents/Defendants

¶29

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(ASMP. NO: 2171 OF 20101

¶30

Petition under Section 151 GPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings including execution of the decree of the Senior Civil Judge, Gooty, passed in O.S No. 105 of 2005 dated 08-092010, pending disposal of the first appeal.

¶31

Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. Kanakala Devi Prasannakumar

¶32

Counsel for the Respondents Nos. 2 & 3: Sri. N Chandra Sekhar Reddy

¶33

Counsel for other Respondents: None Appeared

¶34

The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

AS 795 2010

APHC010597912010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶39

^Soecial Oriainal Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶40

¶41

PRESENT

¶42

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶43

FIRST APPEAL No.795 of 2010

¶44

Between:

¶45

I.Tammenane Mahendra Srinivasulu, S/o. Late Tammenane Mahendra Naga Sayanam, Mentally Disabled under the^careand custody of Wife Guardian T.M.Sarala, aged about 25 years, R/o.Door No.16/112, SLV Road, Guntakal Town & Mandal, Anantapur District.

¶46

...Appellant

¶47

AND

¶48

I.Nannur Mahendra Lalitha, D/o. Late T.M. Nagasayanam, (w/o. N.M. Ramakrishna), Housewife, R/o. D.No.16/220, Mahendra Street, Guntakal Town and Mandal, Anantapur District, and others.

¶49

...Respondents

¶50

Counsel for the Appellant:

¶51

1.KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR

¶52

Counsel for the Respondents:

¶53

N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY

¶54

The Court made the following JUDGMENT:

¶55

At the time of considering the matter, Mr.P.Jagga Reddy,^learned Advocate representing the learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. The learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter dated 12.11.2024 to the Registrar (Judicial) along with the affidavit of the appellant’s Guardian, wherein it is stated that at the

. <1^ 4,

AS_795 2010

intervention of the elders, the matter was settled between the parties. Permission is granted.

¶61

Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall^standclosed.

¶62

¶63

SD/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gooty, Anantapur District.(with records)

¶68

One CC to Sri. Kanakala Devi Prasanna kumar Advocate [OPUC]

¶69

One CC to Sri. N Chandra Sekhar Reddy Advocate [OPUC]

¶70

The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of Andhra^Pradesh.

5. Three CD Copies

SAM

vna

HIGH COURT

; DATED:06/12/2024

JUDGMENT

AS.No.795 of 2010

w 31 DEC 202^1
^ . Current Section
spatcW^^

¶79

DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

Tammenane Mahendra Srinivasulu, Anantapur Dist v. Nannur Mahendra Lalitha, Anantapur District & 11 Ots

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tammenane Mahendra Srinivasulu, Anantapur Dist v. Nannur Mahendra Lalitha, Anantapur District & 11 Ots

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bibi Aasiya Vs Sk. Yasim and 14 Others

Mohammed Tajuddin, Repalle Jcjc Vs Bandaru Ravulamma, Guntur Jcjc & 3 Others

Sadhana Minerals Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Duvvuru Jhansi Vs Kotamreddy Radha Krishna Reddy

V. Hanimi Reddy Vs v. Venkatappa Reddy

Gajula Vivekananda, Vs The District Collector