The High Court dismissed the Land Grabbing Appeal No.15 of 2017 for non-prosecution on the count that the appellant failed to maintain contact with counsel after notice could not be served due to an insufficient address.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; all pending applications stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
AND
HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
LAND GRABBING APPEAL No.15 of 2017
Appeal filed under Section 7-A(3) of A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, against Special Court Under A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act at Hyderabad from the orders of the A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Tribunal (District Judge) at Guntur in LGOP No.7/2009, dated25.07.2013.
Between:
Mohammed Tajuddin, S/o.Shail Madina, R/o. Isukapalli, Repalle, Guntur District, Repalle JCJC
...Petitioner
AND
%
...Respondents
■i. Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri K Srinivas
Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
APHC010469642017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3494]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
LAND GRABBING APPEAL NO: 15/2017
Between:
Mohammed Tajuddin, Repalle, Son of Shali Madina, Resident of Isukapalli, Rapalle, Guntur District, Repalle JCJC.
...PETITIONER
AND
Bandaru Ravulamma. W/o. Chinaramaiah and Others
...RESPONDENT{S)
Counsel for the Petitioner;
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following Judgment: (per NJS,J)
Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the directed to issue notice to the appellant, on 04.10.2024, Registry was appellant. In compliance with the same, notice wassenttotheappellanttothe address furnished in the cause-title, however, thenotice is returned with an
endorsement “in-sufficient address”.
As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed.
/
JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
TK ns
' %
\
HIGH COURT
TK
DATED:04/12/2024
JUDGMENT
LGA.No.15 of 2017
DISMISSING THE LGA FOR NON-PROSECUTION
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the appeal filed against the Tribunal's order under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act
Mohammed Tajuddin
Bandaru Ravulamma
Tamma Malleswari
Neelagiri Sobharani
State of Andhra Pradesh
NINALA JAYASURYA
SUMATHI JAGADAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
