The High Court allowed petitions for substitution of legal representatives. Upon the appellants submitting that the dispute was settled amicably, the Court permitted the withdrawal of the appeal suit.
Appeal Suit No. 561 of 2006 dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
TUESDAY THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
I.A Nos. 1 of 2014. 2 of 2018 AND 1 of 2023
IN/AND
APPEAL SUIT NO: 561 OF 2Q0fi
Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C, against the judgment & decree passed in OS No. 205 of 1993 dt. 27-04-2006 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Guntur.
Between:
i.1
(Appellant nos. 2 to 4 are brought on record as LRsofdeceasedsole appellant vide Court order dated 10.12.2024 In I.A.No.2 of 2018 in A.S.No.561 of 2006).
...Appellant/Defendant No.2
AND
Student, being Minor, rep by its his natural guardian & Next friend V. Siva Reddy, R/o Stambalagaruvu, Guntur Town, Guntur District.
R/o Stambalagaruvu, Guntur Town, Guntur District.
(Respondent Nos. 7 to 10 are brought on record as LRs of deceased Respondent No.5 vide Court order dated 10.12.2024 in I.A.No.1 of 2014 in A.S.No.561 of 2006).
...Respondents
LA. NO: 1 OF 2006fASMP. NO: 1991 OF 2006)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings including the execution of the decree in OS No. 205/1993 dt. 27-04-2006 on the file of the PrI. Senior Civil Judge Guntur, pending disposal of the above appeal
LA. NO: 1 OF 2009fASMP Kin- 268 OF 2Qnq)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents No.2 to 6 herein not to withdraw the amount of Rs.2,39,097/-ps which was deposited to the credit of LAOP No.147 of 1991 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur pending disposal of the A.S.No.561 of 2006 before this Hon'ble Court
LA. NO: 1 OF 2014rASMP. NO: 2397 OF 2014^
Petition under Order XXII Rule 4 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to bring the petitioners herein as LR of 5th respondent as respondents No. 7 to 10 in AS.No. 561 of 2006 on the file of this Hon'ble Court.
lA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Order 22 Rule 3 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to bring the petitioners i.e.1. Vudumula Rukmini, W/o. Late Hanimi Reddy, Hindu, aged 52 years, 2 Vudumula Rajani, W/o. Koppula Hara Krishna Reddy, Hindu, Aged about 37 years, and 3. Vudumula Narasa Reddy, S/o. Late Hanimi Reddy, Hindu, Aged about 35 years, as Appellants in AS.No. 561 of 2006 being the survining legal Representative of the deceased Appellants Vudumula Hanimi Reddy who died on 10.9.2018.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dismiss the AS no. 561 of 2006 for withdraw as settled out of court.
Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Y. Shashank Reddy representing
Sri Raja Reddy Koneti
Counsel for the Respondents: Sri K S Murthy
The Court made the following:
1
AS 561 2006
1
APHC010516122006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA fM PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3494]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
l-A. Nos.1 of 2014. 2 of 2018 & 1 of 2023 IN/AND
APPEAL SUIT No.561 of 2006
Between:
Vudumula Hanimi Reddy (died) per L.Rs.,
... Appellants
AND
Vudumula Venkatappa Reddy (died) per L.Rd.
... Respondents
Counsel for the Appellants Mr.Raja Reddy Koneti
Counsel for the Respondents : Mr.K.S. Murthy
The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (per NJS,J)
I.A. No.2 of 2018 is filed seeking to bring the petitionersonrecord as the Legal Representatives of the deceased appellant.
I.A. No.1 of 2014 is filed seeking to implead the petitioners as respondent Nos.7 to 10 as they are the Legal Representatives of the deceased 5*^ respondents-Vudumuma Yellamma.
Considering the averments made in the affidavits filed in support of the respective petitions, the above petitions are allowed. Registry to make necessary incorporations wherever required.
2
AS 561 2006
\
I.A.No.1 of 2023 is filed seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal suit.
Mr.Y.Shashank Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr.Raja Reddy Koneti, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the parties have resolved the dispute amicably and in view of the same, the appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeal.Healsosubmitsthat in view of the same, the appellants may be permittedtowithdrawthe appeal.
Recording the said submission, I.A. No.1 of 2023 isordered. The appeal suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. All the pending miscellaneous petitions shall standclosed.
To,
SD/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
records if any)
Amaravathi
Stu sree
■x;
HIGH COURT
DATED:10/12/2024
JUDGMENT
I.A Nos. 1 of 2014, 2 of 2018 & 1 of 2023 in/and AS.No.561 of 2006
S’ <br>C 21 FEB 2025 rri
to
^ . Curreiu aecuon ^
ORDERING THE I.A N0.1 OF 2023 DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
4 provisions across 1 enactments
Vudumula Hanimi Reddy
Vudumula Venkatappa Reddy
NINALA JAYASURYA
SUMATHI JAGADAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
