Appeal against a 2008 judgment and decree in a suit was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear despite the matter being posted for dismissal. No order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
K'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
FIRST APPEAL NO: 32 OF 2010
Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C against the JudgmentandDecree dated 26-11-2008 passed in O.S.No. 94 of 2006 on the file of the 1st Additional District Judge, Guntur District, Guntur.
Between:
Abdul Khaleel, S/o. Late Abdul Khayyum, aged about 45 years Foundry worker R/o. Gunturivarithota, Guntur, GunturDistrict.
...Appellant/Defendant No.2
AND
...Respondents/Plaintiff/Def No.1
/
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI. M A KHADER
Counsel for the Respondents No.1: SRI VV ANIL KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI N KRISHNA SUMANTH
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
. i-
1
[3494]
APHC010611222010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
APPEAL SUIT NO: 32/2010
Between:
Abdul Khaleel ...APPELLANT
AND
Shaik Abdul Salam & Another
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant:
I.Mr.M.A.KHADER
Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.VV ANIL KUMAR
2.N KRISHNA SUMANTH
2
The Court made the following Order:
When the matter was called in the morning as also in the afternoon, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant though the matter ISi: posted under the caption 'for dismissal’. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. Hence, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for nonprosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
SOI- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION (Officer
To,
vna
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/11/2024
ORDER
AS.No.32 of 2010
,,g 2 0 FEB 2025 ^
Current Section
DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR NON PROSECUTION
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abdul Khaleel
Shaik Abdul Salam
Mohammed Nazir
Ninala Jayasurya
Sumathi Jagadam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
